2004
DOI: 10.3758/bf03194985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of grouping and attention on the perception of causality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
47
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants reported having the impression that a different object suddenly appeared from behind the occluder in the discontinuous conditions. The distance between the trajectories also had an influence on the event alteration effect-a finding that is consistent with those of the previous studies (Choi & Scholl, 2004;Kawachi & Gyoba, 2006b) 5 : As the distance between the nearby object and the two objects in the stream/ bounce display was increased, the percentage of the streaming percept decreased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Participants reported having the impression that a different object suddenly appeared from behind the occluder in the discontinuous conditions. The distance between the trajectories also had an influence on the event alteration effect-a finding that is consistent with those of the previous studies (Choi & Scholl, 2004;Kawachi & Gyoba, 2006b) 5 : As the distance between the nearby object and the two objects in the stream/ bounce display was increased, the percentage of the streaming percept decreased.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Visual attention has a critical role in motion perception, selecting and integrating visual information across time and space, and keeping track of and identifying moving objects (see, e.g., Cavanagh, 1992;Choi & Scholl, 2004;Pylyshyn & Storm, 1988). Research on the effects of the state of visual attention on stream/bounce perception has revealed that poorer attentional resources directed to the moving object cause more frequent bouncing percepts (K. Watanabe & Shimojo, 1998), suggesting that a sufficient quality of attention is required for constant motion-integration processing, and thus the perception of streaming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies state that existence of a causal event in the surrounding environment improves the perception of causality in a non-causal event by ~80% [12]. Another interesting study is one which examines the ability of perceptual grouping to influence causality [3]. In this study, the authors show that connectivity between a causal and non-causal event improves the perception of causality in the non-causal event, which has some bearing on the connected lines that are employed in visualizing our causal graphs.…”
Section: Perceiving Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%