1992
DOI: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90214-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of habitual caffeine use and acute ingestion: Testing a biobehavioral model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both the unaffected P300 amplitude from previous studies and the smaller P300 amplitude from the present study seem to imply that in these studies, caffeine exerted its psychophysiological effect mainly through a mechanism other than increasing alertness, since elevated arousal is generally related to a larger P300 amplitude 31~. The precise reason for the discrepancy among these studies is not yet clear, because the psychophysiological actions of caffeine are very complicated 9,13,14,19,26) and caffeine-related P300 research has just begun 3,. Moreover, how the P300 component may vary across different paradigms and response conditions has not yet been well-characterized :''3~ Nevertheless, the specific procedural and parametric differences utilized by the present and previous studies have contributed a potential source of discrepancy in the P300 amplitude between these studies ~.30,.~.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Both the unaffected P300 amplitude from previous studies and the smaller P300 amplitude from the present study seem to imply that in these studies, caffeine exerted its psychophysiological effect mainly through a mechanism other than increasing alertness, since elevated arousal is generally related to a larger P300 amplitude 31~. The precise reason for the discrepancy among these studies is not yet clear, because the psychophysiological actions of caffeine are very complicated 9,13,14,19,26) and caffeine-related P300 research has just begun 3,. Moreover, how the P300 component may vary across different paradigms and response conditions has not yet been well-characterized :''3~ Nevertheless, the specific procedural and parametric differences utilized by the present and previous studies have contributed a potential source of discrepancy in the P300 amplitude between these studies ~.30,.~.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…This situation is a learning task that is different from free recall since the experimenter is giving the cue for recall. Caffeine does not affect paired-associate learning performance when recall is assessed immediately [3][4][5], nor when tested after a delay of 20-30 min [4].…”
Section: Caffeine and Incidental Versus Intentional Learningmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In the present study, we found no main effect of caffeine, but a reliable interaction between drug states did occur. In regard to cued recall, Smith et al (1991) found that caffeine did not in¯uence memory after 30 min. We also found no effect of caffeine on cued recall, but previous work in our lab suggests that caffeine state-dependency can occur (Kelemen WL, Creeley CE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%