1989
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-198903000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Halothane and Enflurane on Conduction Velocity and Maximum Rate of Rise of Action Potential Upstroke in Guinea Pig Papillary Muscles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
14
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Least-squares analyses gave the slopes of 0.04 +-0.02. The slope values were far from the theoretical value of 1.0, which would be obtained if the square of the conduction velocity were decreased in proportion to the decrease in the V, , , as is the case by fast sodium channel blockers such as lidocaine (13).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Least-squares analyses gave the slopes of 0.04 +-0.02. The slope values were far from the theoretical value of 1.0, which would be obtained if the square of the conduction velocity were decreased in proportion to the decrease in the V, , , as is the case by fast sodium channel blockers such as lidocaine (13).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Our recent study using conventional microelectrode techniques (13) has suggested that these volatile anesthetics impair the intraventricular conduction by mechanism(s) different from those involving fast sodium channel blockers such as lidocaine or tetrodotoxin. Both halothane and enflurane decrease conduction velocity with little influence on the maximum rate of rise of action potential upstroke (Vmax), whereas fast channel blockers (i.e., tetrodotoxin and lidocaine) decrease the square of the conduction velocity in proportion to the decrease in V, , , (13). These findings suggest that these volatile anesthetics might slow conduction, presumably by increasing the internal longitudinal resistance (i.e., by impairing cell-to-cell electrical coupling).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, Terrar and Victory [18] showed that halothane inhibits cell-to-cell electrical coupling. In addition, Ozaki et al [19], reported that halothane and enflurane reduced the conduction velocity in guinea pig papillary muscles without any significant reduction of Vmax. Spray and Burt [20] showed that a variety of lipophilic molecules, including halothane, and myoplasmic acidification reduce cell-to-cell electrical coupling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Sevoflurane and isoflurane may have similar effects, which may cause a selective depression of delayed conduction in the infarcted zone. However, several inves tigators suggested that mechanisms of the effects of the volatile anesthetics and class I antiarrhythmic drugs on ventricular conduction may be different (10,17,18). Ozaki et al reported that halothane and enflurane depressed the conduction velocity without depressing vmax in isolated guinea pig papillary muscle (10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed that halothane decreased the maximal rate of depolarization (Vm3, slowed the conduction and prolonged the effective refrac tory period in the infarcted zones. On the other hand, Ozaki et al reported that volatile anesthetics such as halothane or enflurane slowed ventricular conduction without any significant depression of Vmax in isolated guinea pig papillary muscle (10). It is well known that ven tricular delayed conduction in infarcted myocardium plays an important role in the occurrence of reentrant ven tricular arrhythmias and that class I antiarrhythmic drugs cause their antiarrhythmic actions partly by a block of the delayed conduction (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%