2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hand preference on digit lengths and digit ratios among children and adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This explicitly indicates that the same mechanism is not mediating the effects of different variables (which may not be clear in a single‐digit ratio study). Thus, the present study adds support to the significance of multiple digit ratios study design (Kumar et al, 2017; Kumar, Singh, & Voracek, 2020; Loehlin et al, 2009; Stolten et al, 2016; Voracek, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…This explicitly indicates that the same mechanism is not mediating the effects of different variables (which may not be clear in a single‐digit ratio study). Thus, the present study adds support to the significance of multiple digit ratios study design (Kumar et al, 2017; Kumar, Singh, & Voracek, 2020; Loehlin et al, 2009; Stolten et al, 2016; Voracek, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It was found that the right 2D:4D ratio correlates with the duration of bipolar disorder in manic patients. It is known that the 2D:4D ratio is more sensitive in the right hand compared to the left [20]. We believe that the right hand 2D:4D ratio can be used to determine the chronicity of the disease in cases where su cient medical history cannot be obtained in manic patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%