2020
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0000000000000882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Head Movements on Sound-Source Localization in Single-Sided Deaf Patients With Their Cochlear Implant On Versus Off

Abstract: Objectives-We investigated the ability of single-sided deaf listeners implanted with a cochlear implant (SSD-CI) to (i) determine the front-back and left-right location of sound sources presented from loudspeakers surrounding the listener and (ii) use small head rotations to further improve their localization performance. The resulting behavioral data were used for further analyses investigating the value of so-called "monaural" spectral shape cues for front-back sound source localization.Design-Eight SSD-CI p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a monaural listening experiment, normal-hearing listeners with one ear plugged showed no benefit of head rotations when localizing sounds located in the horizontal plane (Hirahara et al, 2021). However, single-sided deaf listeners do appear to utilize and even rely on changes in head position to induce changes in the monaural cues produced by the direction-dependent high-frequency attenuation resulting from acoustic head shadowing (Pastore et al, 2020).…”
Section: E Ects Of the Acoustic Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a monaural listening experiment, normal-hearing listeners with one ear plugged showed no benefit of head rotations when localizing sounds located in the horizontal plane (Hirahara et al, 2021). However, single-sided deaf listeners do appear to utilize and even rely on changes in head position to induce changes in the monaural cues produced by the direction-dependent high-frequency attenuation resulting from acoustic head shadowing (Pastore et al, 2020).…”
Section: E Ects Of the Acoustic Cuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence from individuals with bimodal hearing through a CI and a hearing aid indicate large mismatches in place, level, and timing of interaural stimulation that are the likely cause of continuing deficits in binaural/spatial hearing in bimodal users ( 20 22 ). The localization of both stationary and moving sound appears to improve slightly, but significantly, with CI use in adult SSD users ( 23 , 24 ), and discrimination of front versus back sounds can be improved with head movement ( 25 ). Less is known about the effects of CI use on spatial hearing in children with SSD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reported data also show considerable variability in the degree to which localization accuracy is affected by monaural hearing, suggesting the adaptive contribution of the monaural level cues and monaural pinna cues, which normally play a minor role. For example, relatively good localization has been found in some adults with various degrees of unilateral hearing loss, whereas others cannot localize at all ( Slattery and Middlebrooks, 1994 ; Van Wanrooij, 2004 ; Shub et al, 2008 ; Agterberg et al, 2012 ; Firszt et al, 2017 ; Pastore et al, 2020 ). The variable impact of hearing loss on localization ability, even in individuals with unilateral sensorineural single-sided deafness (SSD), indicates that hearing loss in the poorer ear alone does not eradicate the potential to localize sound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deprived of binaural difference cues, the adaptive change in SSD would rely on increased proficiency of using remaining monaural spatial cues. Monaural level cues are primarily used over monaural spectral shape cues ( Shub et al, 2008 ; Pastore et al, 2020 ). Although inherently ambiguous, the monaural level cue can serve as a valid cue to azimuth because the learned sound will appear louder when presented on the better-hearing side ( Agterberg et al, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%