2011
DOI: 10.5423/ppj.2011.27.3.266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Heavy Metal Contamination from an Abandoned Mine on Tomato Growth and Root-knot Nematode Development

Abstract: Physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal content of soils located along the drainage way of an abandoned mine at Busan, Korea (35 o 31'N, 129 o 22'E) (contaminated soil; CS) and uncontaminated soils (50− 70 m apart from the drainage way) (NS) were examined. Growth of tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicom cv. Rutgers) in CS and NS, development of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) as root-knot gall formation on tomato plants, and non-parasitic nematode populations in soil were also examine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to tomato grown in uncontaminated soil (Control), biomass accumulation in root, shoot and leaf was significantly decreased for tomato grown in heavy metals-contaminated soil without application of amendment (HMS) (Fig. 6), which is consistent with previous study [38]. Compared to natural palygorskite (PAL), the application of its modified form (KH550-PAL) significantly improved biomass accumulation of root, shoot and leaf in tomato grown in heavy metals-contaminated soil with Pb, Cd and Zn (Fig.…”
Section: Biomass Accumulation In Root Shoot and Leafsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Compared to tomato grown in uncontaminated soil (Control), biomass accumulation in root, shoot and leaf was significantly decreased for tomato grown in heavy metals-contaminated soil without application of amendment (HMS) (Fig. 6), which is consistent with previous study [38]. Compared to natural palygorskite (PAL), the application of its modified form (KH550-PAL) significantly improved biomass accumulation of root, shoot and leaf in tomato grown in heavy metals-contaminated soil with Pb, Cd and Zn (Fig.…”
Section: Biomass Accumulation In Root Shoot and Leafsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This suggests that when waters draining from abandoned mines contain low levels of heavy metals, especially Cd and Pb, the total accumulations will not exceed MHMRC in agricultural soils irrigated by these waters within several months. In our experiment, even under conditions in which heavy metal accumulation in soil exceeded MHMRC, no symptoms or damages from heavy metal toxicity were observed on the tomato plants, which is in contrast to severe damages observed in tomato plants grown in soil contaminated with high concentrations of heavy metals ( Park et al, 2011b ). This suggests it is difficult to detect any visible adverse short-term effects of heavy metal contamination at low levels on physiological disorders caused by heavy metals.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Decreases in nematode community abundance and richness resulting from heavy metal contamination have been reported in many studies ( Georgieva et al, 2002 ; Korthals et al, 1996a , 1996b ; Park et al, 2011b ; Popovici, 1994 ; Yeates et al, 1993 ). However, only abundance of sensitive nematode species is reduced in the soils exposed to light to moderate heavy metal contamination, while the abundance of tolerant species is not changed or increased in these soils ( Korthals et al, 1996a , 1996b ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The decrease of nematode abundance induced by selenite ( Figure 2B ) and a negative correlation between nematode abundance and soil bioavailable Se ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 5 ) were observed. Similarly, high concentrations of trace elements in agricultural soils, such as As, Zn, Cu, and Ni, have been reported to decrease nematode abundance in previous studies (Korthals et al, 1996 ; Park et al, 2011 ). The decreased nematode abundance may be achieved through two mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%