2016
DOI: 10.24264/lfj.16.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of High Heels on Centre of Pressure Progression during Walking in Young Women

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The purpose of this study was to discuss the differences in centre of pressure (COP) spatio-temporal progression during walking between barefoot condition and wearing high heels condition. The data were collected from 35 young women by a combined Footscan® system. The mean COP path, the displacement and phase of COP, the relationship of the peak medial-lateral displacement with time and the plantar pressure of five plantar regions were calculated in both barefoot and wearing high heels condition. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
(85 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In heel strike situation, those who wear high heels experience an enormous plantar pressure, whereas in push-off plantar pressure increases in the anterior part of the foot or the Metatarsophalangeal Part (MTP) and the first MTP to get the most pressure (Yu et al, 2013;Sylvia, 2018). Plantar pressure on the first MTP or medial front due to the increased plantar pressure when walking in high heels can cause the deformation of hallux valgus (Ran et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In heel strike situation, those who wear high heels experience an enormous plantar pressure, whereas in push-off plantar pressure increases in the anterior part of the foot or the Metatarsophalangeal Part (MTP) and the first MTP to get the most pressure (Yu et al, 2013;Sylvia, 2018). Plantar pressure on the first MTP or medial front due to the increased plantar pressure when walking in high heels can cause the deformation of hallux valgus (Ran et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%