2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2021.110461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of high versus low inspiratory oxygen fraction on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
12
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 Thus, some uncertainty remains regarding this balance of beneficial versus deleterious effects, and it might depend on certain patient and surgical characteristics. Although there are recent systematic reviews on this topic, 7,8 there are new trials to consider, 9,10 and these previous reviews have not extensively explored the potential effect heterogeneity between trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Thus, some uncertainty remains regarding this balance of beneficial versus deleterious effects, and it might depend on certain patient and surgical characteristics. Although there are recent systematic reviews on this topic, 7,8 there are new trials to consider, 9,10 and these previous reviews have not extensively explored the potential effect heterogeneity between trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to our study results, if we interpret only the LUSS results performed after surgery in the BMI ≥ 30 group, similar to the results of a recent meta-analysis, there was no significant difference in the degree of atelectasis. [15][16][17] However, we believe that the difference in LUSS before and after surgery better reflects the rate of atelectasis after surgery and is important for clinically judging the risk and benefit of patients requiring high-concentration oxygen infusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16] However, this meta-analysis did not consider the degree of atelectasis of the obese patient prior to anesthesia, and the various durations of exposure to different concentrations of oxygen and various types of surgeries were included. [12,13,[15][16][17] Therefore, this study was designed to target patients undergoing surgery that does not affect lung dynamics, to avoid exposure to high concentrations of oxygen even for a short period of time in the group receiving a low FiO 2 , and to examine the effect of inhaled oxygen concentration on the development of atelectasis by differentiating obese and normal-weight patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that this absence of protective effect in these subgroups of interest strongly reduces the potential interest of systematic high intraoperative FiO 2 . This becomes even more relevant when considering the results of another recent meta-analysis focusing on the effect of high vs. low intraoperative FiO 2 on respiratory outcomes, which did not report any beneficial effect on clinical outcomes such as hospital length-of-stay or mortality, and on the contrary a higher incidence of postoperative radiographic atelectasis associated with reduced postoperative PaO 2 values 54 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%