2001
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of histone acetylation on the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites 1 1Edited by R. Ebright

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
110
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we hypothesize that the WT H4 tail can freely explore its conformational space, while acetylation is an autoinhibitory molecular switch that leads to H4 tail's sequestration by its own nucleosome. Our mechanism may provide a molecular explanation for the experiments conducted by Widom and coworkers (48,49), who have observed similar rates for transcriptional elongation by either acetylation or complete removal of the H4 histone tails. From the broader perspective of the general mechanisms for regulating IDPs, our work indicates that posttranslational modifications significantly remodel IDPs' energy landscapes and may induce somewhat complicated disorder-to-less-disorder conformational phase transitions.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Hence, we hypothesize that the WT H4 tail can freely explore its conformational space, while acetylation is an autoinhibitory molecular switch that leads to H4 tail's sequestration by its own nucleosome. Our mechanism may provide a molecular explanation for the experiments conducted by Widom and coworkers (48,49), who have observed similar rates for transcriptional elongation by either acetylation or complete removal of the H4 histone tails. From the broader perspective of the general mechanisms for regulating IDPs, our work indicates that posttranslational modifications significantly remodel IDPs' energy landscapes and may induce somewhat complicated disorder-to-less-disorder conformational phase transitions.…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The RNA polymerase II motor also is expected to be capable of generating forces that overcome obstacles during translocation and is thus a source of peeling force for nucleosomal invasion. The destabilization of chromatin structure and subsequent increase in polymerase access achieved by covalent modifications such as acetylation has been documented (23,24). Chromatinremodeling machines like SWI͞SNF, whose motor subunits are members of the helicase family of proteins, are known to modify the structure of nucleosomes by perturbing DNA-protein interactions and by inducing topological changes in nucleosomal DNA that are conducive to transcriptional activation (25,26).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 and 6). Generally, DNA is more accessible to restriction enzymes in unfolded (open) chromatin (39,40). EcoRI digestion of nuclei, combined with psoralen as a probe for chromatin structure, indicates that rDNA becomes less accessible to EcoRI during early repair times (up to 1 h) and more accessible at later repair times (2-4 h) (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5B). Because nucleosomes are an impediment to restriction enzyme accessibility (39,40), only the active rDNA (s-band) is released (Fig. 5B, lanes 3-8).…”
Section: Release Of Active Ribosomal Genes By Ecori Digestion Of Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%