2016
DOI: 10.1111/oik.02998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hummingbird morphology on specialization in pollination networks vary with resource availability

Abstract: Specialization of species in interaction networks infl uences network stability and ecosystem functioning. Spatial and temporal variation in resource availability may provide insight into how ecological factors, such as resource abundance, and evolutionary factors, such as phylogenetically conserved morphological traits, infl uence specialization within mutualistic networks. We used independent measures of hummingbird abundance and resources (nectar), information on hummingbird traits and plant -hummingbird in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
61
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
61
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Bill length and curvature were measured by inspecting an average of 10 adult specimens, both males and females, deposited in museums (Zanata, Dalsgaard, Rahbek, & Varassin, ; see details in Supporting Information Appendix S6); body mass data were gathered from the literature (Supporting Information Appendix S2). For all three traits, we used the mean trait values per species, because interspecific trait variation is larger than intraspecific variation and plays a larger role in determining the division of floral resources among coexisting hummingbird species (Graham et al, ; Tinoco, Graham, Aguilar, & Schleuning, ). In our data, the intraspecific coefficient of variation (CV) across all hummingbird species averaged 6.2% for bill length and 8.3% for bill curvature, whereas interspecific variation amounted to 42.4% and 246.9%, respectively (see also Supporting Information Appendix S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bill length and curvature were measured by inspecting an average of 10 adult specimens, both males and females, deposited in museums (Zanata, Dalsgaard, Rahbek, & Varassin, ; see details in Supporting Information Appendix S6); body mass data were gathered from the literature (Supporting Information Appendix S2). For all three traits, we used the mean trait values per species, because interspecific trait variation is larger than intraspecific variation and plays a larger role in determining the division of floral resources among coexisting hummingbird species (Graham et al, ; Tinoco, Graham, Aguilar, & Schleuning, ). In our data, the intraspecific coefficient of variation (CV) across all hummingbird species averaged 6.2% for bill length and 8.3% for bill curvature, whereas interspecific variation amounted to 42.4% and 246.9%, respectively (see also Supporting Information Appendix S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Durante las floraciones de 2015 y 2016 con la ayuda de tubos capilares se extrajo el néctar de los diez apéndices bulbosos de 70 flores en 24 plantas. Se midió la concentración de azucares con un refractómetro manual calibrado [9]. En total se colectó 1849,30 µl de néctar, obteniendo un volumen por flor de 26,4 ± 15,25 µl (3,2-58,4 µl, n = 70).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Una flor promedio tendría 3,2 mg de azúcar, y una planta 249,6 mg de azúcar en el néctar de todas sus flores. Estos resultados indican que Axinaea merianiae oferta mayor volumen de néctar que 24 especies de plantas de la región que son utilizadas por colibríes (con un promedio de 7,7 µl) [9] y que 46 especies utilizadas por colibríes en los Andes Colombianos (con promedio de 12,6 µl) [8]. A pesar de los altos volúmenes, la concentración de azúcar del néctar se mantiene similar a aquella de otras especies que ofertan néctar a colibríes [6,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, Tinoco et al. , Weinstein and Graham ). Currently, little quantitative information is available concerning the plants used by Black‐breasted Pufflegs and how floral morphology may influence their foraging preferences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%