2004
DOI: 10.1063/1.1689392
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hydrostatic and uniaxial stress on the Schottky barrier heights of Ga-polarity and N-polarity n-GaN

Abstract: We report measurements of the Schottky barrier heights of Ni/Au contacts on Ga-polarity and N-polarity n-GaN under hydrostatic pressure and applied in-plane uniaxial stress. Under hydrostatic pressure the two different polarities of GaN yield significantly different rates of Schottky barrier height increase with increasing pressure. Uniaxial stress parallel to the surface affects the Schottky barrier height only minimally. The observed changes in barrier height under stress are attributed to a combination of b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been reported that the SBHs of GaAs, 30,31 GaN, 32 and GaAlN 33 Schottky barrier shift under stress and strain due to the band structure change and piezoelectric effect. Experiments and calculations have shown that the band gap changes under strain and stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that the SBHs of GaAs, 30,31 GaN, 32 and GaAlN 33 Schottky barrier shift under stress and strain due to the band structure change and piezoelectric effect. Experiments and calculations have shown that the band gap changes under strain and stress.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By assuming S, A ** , T, and N D are to be known, φ s can, in principle, be derived from the ln I-V plot. 12 Subsequently, the strain-induced change in SBH can be determine by 12,17,18 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the stress dependence of A ** arises only from the stress dependence of the effective mass, the first term is much smaller than the second term and is thus neglected in the following discussion. 17,18,23 The change of SBH ∆φ s with strain for bias of 1.0 V is plotted in Figure 3c (black curve). Similarly, under a bias of -1.0 V, the change of SBH ∆φ d with strain is calculated and the data are plotted in Figure 3c (red curve).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, an increase of the Schottky barrier height of GaN with pressure was observed and attributed to a combination of piezoelectric and band structure effects [1]. Similarly, the increase in the ex- trapolated barrier height of the AlGaN MSM structure with pressure is tentatively attributed to that same mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recent work by Liu et al reported on the effects of hydrostatic and uniaxial stress on the electrical characteristics of Schottky diodes on n-type GaN [1]. In the present work, we demonstrate the effect of hydrostatic pressure on the current vs. voltage characteristics of Al x Ga 1-x N metal-semiconductor-metal (MSM) structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 75%