2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.11.430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hydrostatic pressure on strain measurement with distributed optical fiber sensing system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hybrid DFOS tool can sense small strain and temperature changes at high measurement accuracy (10 με/0.5°C) and spatial resolution (5 cm) over a long-range distance (~25 km). The accuracy of the DFOS technique was demonstrated in several previous laboratory and field tests (Kogure et al, 2015;Kogure & Okuda, 2018;Xue et al, 2014;Xue & Hashimoto, 2017;Zhang et al, 2019). In the study, two water injection tests at sections ① (186.8-188.8 m) and ② (204.4-206.4 m) were presented and considered.…”
Section: Configurations Of Two Adjacent Wellsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hybrid DFOS tool can sense small strain and temperature changes at high measurement accuracy (10 με/0.5°C) and spatial resolution (5 cm) over a long-range distance (~25 km). The accuracy of the DFOS technique was demonstrated in several previous laboratory and field tests (Kogure et al, 2015;Kogure & Okuda, 2018;Xue et al, 2014;Xue & Hashimoto, 2017;Zhang et al, 2019). In the study, two water injection tests at sections ① (186.8-188.8 m) and ② (204.4-206.4 m) were presented and considered.…”
Section: Configurations Of Two Adjacent Wellsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Xue et al (2018) and Zhang et al (2018) attached a fiber to Berea and Tako sandstone cores and proved the validity of hybrid DFOS to monitor induced strain at varying confining/pore pressures. For field-scale measurements, Xue et al (2014), Xue and Hashimoto (2017), and Sun et al (2018) deployed the DFOS behind a well casing to sense geomechanical deformation in water injection, extraction, and jet tests. Furthermore, the in situ behaviors of microseismicity and deformation are monitored via fiber optics in laboratories and/or field tests (Cappa et al, 2006(Cappa et al, , 2008(Cappa et al, , 2019Freifeld et al, 2014;Guglielmi et al, 2015;Moore et al, 2010;Sanada et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to make accurate predictions, a geomechanical model needs to be first calibrated against geophysical and geomechanical data obtained from monitoring. As a new technology, continuous and distributed fiber optic sensing (DFOS) technology based on Brillouin and/or Rayleigh scattering has great potential in geotechnical monitoring at both laboratory and field scales [16][17][18][19][20]. Optical fiber sensors have advantages such as their immunity against electromagnetic interference, low weight, small size, high sensitivity, and large bandwidth.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 capture and storage (CCS) in saline aquifers has been recognized as one of the most effective technologies for reducing CO 2 emissions in the short to medium term; CO 2 is generally stored at depths greater than 800 m, reaching depths of up to 2–3 km in some sedimentary basins. It is therefore clear that high-accuracy strain monitoring and instrumentation are important and urgent for geophysicists and reservoir engineers to gain real-time information concerning the flow and migration of fluids that are injected under deep subsurface environments. However, because of the complexities of this process, with its inherent uncertainties and lack of visibility, , it has become both crucial and challenging to discover a means by which high-accuracy, elaborative, and permanent in situ monitoring of the dynamic processes of unconventional energy exploitation and geological disposals can be achieved. , Although it is generally agreed that several of the existing tools used for monitoring can be comparatively robust, they are currently deemed unsuitable for in situ permanent deformation monitoring in field-scale geoengineering applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%