1973
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1973.35.3.336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hyperinflation of the thorax on the mechanics of breathing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When points of equal V E are compared V T is reduced by Cf'Pb. These results agree in general with the above studies in man, However, the more rapid reduction of VL,E with hyperventilation after lung inflation than during normal carbon dioxide rebreathing implies some increased expiratory effort under conditions of CPPB perhaps related to increased abdominal muscle activity (Grassino et al, 1973;Urbschect, Bishop & Bachofen, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When points of equal V E are compared V T is reduced by Cf'Pb. These results agree in general with the above studies in man, However, the more rapid reduction of VL,E with hyperventilation after lung inflation than during normal carbon dioxide rebreathing implies some increased expiratory effort under conditions of CPPB perhaps related to increased abdominal muscle activity (Grassino et al, 1973;Urbschect, Bishop & Bachofen, 1973).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In man most studies have been of the few breaths immediately after lung inflation, but consistent findings are a fall in tidal volume and increase in respiratory frequency with a fall in total minute ventilation (Flenley, Pengelly & Milic-Emili, 1971;Grassino, Lewinsohn & Tyler, 1973;Green, Mead & Sears, 1978). In agreement with our findings Flenley et al (1971) found no prolongation of T e • Green et al (1978) found no change in the relative duration of inspiration and expiration, which is contrary to our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The mean factor responsible of this mechanical disadvantage is the perma nent high lung volume in obstructive diseases [23,72], There is also some evidence that CO2 breathing per se produced in man a small but statistically significant increase in total lung capacity by a centrally mediated vagal reflex [68]. It has been, moreover, demonstrated that in animals [52] as well as in man [32,49,50], the effectiveness of respiratory muscles as a pressure generator decreases by increasing lung volume. Hypercapnia in obstructive patients as well as in healthy subjects might increase the electrical activity of the phrenic nerve bursts, but the thoracomuscular apparatus might not be able to convert the central drive into an increased ventilation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the presence of mechanical impairment of the thoracopulmonary system it is very difficult to find an index of respiratory drive. In fact the response to CO2 is depressed also in normal subjects if the ventilation is loaded [10,14,18,27,53] or if the chest wall is hyperinsufflated by extrathoracic negative pressure [32] or by positive inspiratory pressure [24]. According to these observations, it seems misleading to evaluate the respiratory drive from ventilatory response in the presence of loaded breathing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the consequence of an improved compliance of the chest wall and the lungs [65], an improved respiratory muscle function, an increased respiratory drive [62] and a lowering oxygen consumption secondary to a decrease in work of breathing or an increase in efficiency of the respiratory muscle function or perhaps a reduction of chronic respiratory muscle fatigue [66 -68]. The relief of chronic respiratory muscle fatigue remains controversial, as well as the concept of chronic respiratory muscle fatigue.…”
Section: Nasal Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%