1997
DOI: 10.1063/1.119207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of in situ doping from B2H6 and PH3 on hydrogen desorption and the low-temperature growth mode of Si on Si(100) by remote plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition

Abstract: Chemical vapor deposition of undoped and in-situ boron-and arsenic-doped epitaxial and polycrystalline silicon films grown using silane at reduced pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the reaction temperature of hydrogen desorption from Si-H is shifted lower for boron-doped films than that for undoped films in an opposite manner for the phosphorus-doped film, as predicted by the result of temperature programmed desorption ͑TPD͒ of hydrogen from each doped layer. 10 In our study, when B 2 H 6 was supplied along with Si 2 H 6 , doping efficiency was low; however, when B 2 H 6 was supplied alternately with Si 2 H 6 , the efficiency increased by about one order of magnitude. These facts clearly show that the doping method used in MLE is advantageous for impurity doping technology.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 42%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the reaction temperature of hydrogen desorption from Si-H is shifted lower for boron-doped films than that for undoped films in an opposite manner for the phosphorus-doped film, as predicted by the result of temperature programmed desorption ͑TPD͒ of hydrogen from each doped layer. 10 In our study, when B 2 H 6 was supplied along with Si 2 H 6 , doping efficiency was low; however, when B 2 H 6 was supplied alternately with Si 2 H 6 , the efficiency increased by about one order of magnitude. These facts clearly show that the doping method used in MLE is advantageous for impurity doping technology.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 42%
“…This phenomenon seems to depend on the effect that the desorption temperature of hydrogen for phosphorus-doped film shifts to a higher temperature compared to intrinsic Si͑100͒. 10 The coverage of phosphorus influences not only the surface migration, but also the surface reaction rate of Si-H species for Si growth, namely, a higher concentration of phosphorus on Si͑100͒ acts to prevent hydrogen desorption from Si-H adsorbate. It is assumed that the Si-H bonding of P-SiH heterodimers is more stable than that of Si-SiH homodimers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many low-temperature epitaxial Si growth processes at temperatures below the H desorption temperature (about 540 • C for monohydride on an Si(001) surface [90]), the activation energy for growth is consistent with that for hydrogen desorption [71,72,91]. Namely, the H elimination from the H-terminated Si surface is the rate-limiting process for epitaxial growth.…”
Section: First-principles Simulation Of H Abstraction From Hydrogenat...mentioning
confidence: 59%
“…For instance, group V impurities, like arsenic, antimony, and bismuth, have been widely employed as surfactants to control surface stress in heteroepitaxial growth . In addition, for formation of ultrashallow junction with high dopant concentrations (required for nanometer-scale electronic devices), in situ chemical doping has been recognized as a working alternative to currently widely used low-energy ion implantation . To achieve precise control of doping profiles, it would be necessary to better understand the effect of surface and/or subsurface dopant atoms on surface chemical reactions, along with the effect of adsorbates on dopant dynamics at the surface and/or subsurface layers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 In addition, for formation of ultrashallow junction with high dopant concentrations (required for nanometer-scale electronic devices), in situ chemical doping has been recognized as a working alternative to currently widely used low-energy ion implantation. 5 To achieve precise control of doping profiles, it would be necessary to better understand the effect of surface and/or subsurface dopant atoms on surface chemical reactions, along with the effect of adsorbates on dopant dynamics at the surface and/or subsurface layers. As device dimensions shrink below 100 nm, indeed, the dopant-surface interactions become of great concern in various device manufacturing processes, such as etching and deposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%