2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00348-004-0801-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of imaging system blur on measurements of flow scalars and scalar gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the smallest pattern resolved, both vertical and horizontal MTFs (modulation transfer functions) are higher than the criteria given by Wang and Clemens [19]. From this information, one can assume that the pixel projection is close to the real resolution (i.e., 0.11 mm/pixel).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…With the smallest pattern resolved, both vertical and horizontal MTFs (modulation transfer functions) are higher than the criteria given by Wang and Clemens [19]. From this information, one can assume that the pixel projection is close to the real resolution (i.e., 0.11 mm/pixel).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This camera has 1280 × 1024 pixels with individual pixel sizes of 6.7 µm × 6.7 µm and a quantum efficiency (QE) of 36% at 532 nm. The Rayleigh imaging system step response function (SRF) was measured using the scanning knife edge method outlined by Wang and Clemens [11] and references contained within. From the SRF the line spread function (LSF) was calculated and a FWHM of 40 µm was predicted.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optical resolution was determined primarily by the pair of achromatic lenses at the front end of the collection system. The measured line-spread function at best focus was $40 lm FWHM for each system at fixed wavelength, using a knife edge method [40]. Final focusing of each camera was accomplished using a laser-drilled target with a linear pattern of 50 lm holes on 200 lm centers, located on the plane bisecting the laser alignment aperture.…”
Section: Multi-scalar Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%