Effects of immersion in mouthwash for different durations and with different ethanol concentrations on the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resin

Yofarindra, Belladina Maulani; Damiyanti, Mia; Herda, Ellyza

doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1073/3/032002

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Overall, there are limited knowledge regarding the effect of mouthrinses on the surface roughness of nanohybrid resin composites, which have many physical, chemical, and aesthetic advantages. It has been reported that ethanolcontaining mouthrinses affect the surface roughness of nanohybrid resin composites [13,14]. Since nanohybrid resin composites are routinely used as restorative materials, and because the use of mouthrinses is becoming more common, it is important to evaluate the effect of mouthrinses (which have different contents, active ingredients, pH and alcohol concentrations) on nanohybrid resin composites.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Mouthrinses on Surface Roughness of Two Nanohybrid Resin Composites

Yılmaz

Müjdeci

2021

BDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of four different mouthrinses on the surface roughness of two nanohybrid resin composites. Material and Methods: Fifty samples were prepared for each of the resin composites (2x8 mm) and a profilometer was used to determine the initial surface roughness (Ra) of each sample. Then, they were divided into 5 subgroups (n= 10), and exposed to the following mouthrinses (12h, 37 ºC): containing alcohol and essential oils; alcohol and chlorhexidine; alcohol-free and essential oils; alcohol free and cetil prydinium chlorite; or distilled water (control). The surface roughness of each sample was measured again. Statistical analyses of the data were performed via two-way ANOVA and Bonferroni tests. Results: Overall, statistically significant differences were not found between the resin composites (p> 0.05), but significant differences were found among the mouthrinses (p< 0.05). Interactions between the mouthrinses and the resin composites was statistically significant (p< 0.05). Both of the resin composites had the highest surface roughness after exposure to mouthrinse with alcohol and essential oils (p< 0.05), followed by mouthrinse with alcohol and chlorhexidine. Both alcohol-free mouthrinses caused surface roughness either similar to distilled water (p> 0.05) or lower than distilled water (p< 0.05) on the nanohybrid resin composites used. Conclusion: The mouthrinses affected the surface roughness of the resin composites in different ways. This was dependent on mouthrinse contents and the chemical structure of the resin composites. Alcohol-containing mouthrinses caused the most changes in the surface roughness of both resin composites. Keywords Alcohol; Chlorhexidine; Composite resin; Essential oil; Roughness.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Effect of Mouthrinses on Surface Roughness of Two Nanohybrid Resin Composites

Yılmaz

Müjdeci

2021

BDS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thermocycling showed a deteriorating effect over the three tested materials that may be due to water absorption as the water molecules inside the polymeric structure have a plasticizing effect (22) . Furthermore, the change in the temperature would be associated with the reduction in the intermolecular bonds between the matrix chains.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Food Simulating Fluids and Thermocycling on Surface Roughness and Wear Resistance of Dental Composite Restoratives.

Mubarak

2022

Egyptian Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of the investigation was to evaluate the effect of food simulating fluids and thermocycling on surface roughness and wear resistance of CAD/CAM (Lava TM Ultimate, 3M ESPE), (SR Nexco® Paste, Ivoclar Vivadent) and (Filtek TM Z350 XT, 3M ESPE) resin composites.Methods: A total of 360 disks were fabricated and divided into three groups. Each group was divided into 12 subgroups (n=10); 6 subgroups for measuring surface roughness and the other 6 subgroups for measuring wear resistance. Four subgroups are immersed for 1 month in different food simulating fluids (distilled water, ethanol, heptane and citric acid). The fifth subgroup was thermocycled for 5000 cycle, while the control subgroups were examined after 24 hours postpolymerization. Surface roughness was assessed using environmental scanning electron microscope. Wear resistance testing was carried out by custom made toothbrush machine. The results were tabulated and statistically analyzed. Results:The results revealed that the food simulating fluids and thermocycling had a deteriorating effect on the three tested materials. Lava TM Ultimate showed the least significant deterioration when compared to SR Nexco® Paste and Filtek TM Z350 XT. Conclusion:Lava TM Ultimate had better resistance to both food simulating fluids and thermocycling, which may be due to its higher nanofillers percentage and its highly cross linked matrix.

show abstract

“…Consequently, it is important to study their effects on restored surfaces. [12][13][14] Studies 15,16 have demonstrated positive results regarding aesthetics of materials that simulate gum tissue along the cervical margins such as GR, receiving positive evaluation from patients. Conversely, there is a lack of studies that focus on an in-depth exploration of the properties of these materials.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of light curing unit and antiseptic mouthwashes on the physical properties of gingiva-colored composite resin

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: This study evaluated surface roughness (Ra) and color difference (ΔE00) of a gingiva-colored composite resin (NT Premium Gengiva, Coltene), light-activated with three light curing units (LCU) and immersed in different mouthwash solutions. Methods: 90 composite specimens (n=10) were divided according to the LCU: L1-Valo, L2-Bluephase and L3-Optilight Max; and solution: S1-alcohol-based antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint), S2-alcohol-free antiseptic mouthwash (Listerine Cool Mint Zero Alcohol) and S3-water (control). Immersions were performed for 30 s, 2x/day, for 21 days. Ra and coordinates of luminosity (L*) and color (a* and b*) were measured using a rugosimeter (SJ-201 P/M) and a spectrophotometer (SP62S), respectively, at: T0-start, T1-7 days, T2-14 days and T3-21 days. Results: L1 (1.3±0.9) presented higher Ra than L3 (0.7±0.6) and L2 (1.0±0.8); and Ra for S2 (0.9±0.1) was greater than S3 (-0.1±0.1), and S1 (0.1±0.1). Moreover, L1 (23.3±0.3) presented lower ΔE00 t han L 2 (24.7±0.3) a nd L 3 (25.1±0.3). Conclusion: Ra of the gingiva-colored composite resin tested increased when L1 and S2 were used, although L1-cured specimens also showed the lowest ΔE00.

show abstract

Effects of immersion in mouthwash for different durations and with different ethanol concentrations on the surface roughness of nanohybrid composite resin

Cited by 3 publications

References 8 publications

The Effect of Mouthrinses on Surface Roughness of Two Nanohybrid Resin Composites

The Effect of Mouthrinses on Surface Roughness of Two Nanohybrid Resin Composites

Influence of Food Simulating Fluids and Thermocycling on Surface Roughness and Wear Resistance of Dental Composite Restoratives.

Effect of light curing unit and antiseptic mouthwashes on the physical properties of gingiva-colored composite resin

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About