2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2021.109182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of immunosuppression on the efficacy of vaccination against Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection in chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 collection of blood from the Vena jugularis using Vacutainer. 5 aseptic sampling of milk for bacteriological and single cell count analyses. 6 swab sampling (eye, ear, nose and vagina).…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 collection of blood from the Vena jugularis using Vacutainer. 5 aseptic sampling of milk for bacteriological and single cell count analyses. 6 swab sampling (eye, ear, nose and vagina).…”
Section: Clinical Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are minimalist prokaryotes possessing small genomes with limited coding capacity, yet they can cause considerable damage to the livestock industry [1]. Although vaccines are available for some avian and porcine mycoplasma species, successful vaccines have so far been evasive for most of other species, including ruminant pathogens [2][3][4][5]. One of the major factors hampering vaccine development is…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some U. diversum strains result in immunosuppression by significantly inducing IL-10 expression upon incubation with bovine macrophages [ 73 ]. This increases the susceptibility of the host to other disease-causing pathogens and interferes with the effectiveness of experimental vaccinations against these pathogens [ 73 , 91 ]. rGUDIV-103 stimulated lymphoproliferation and induced iNOS , IL-1β , TNF-α , TLR2 , and TLR4 expression, suggesting that it is a promising target protein for immunobiological studies, as immunostimulation activates the elements capable of fighting infections and cellular and humoral immune responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ADWG was computed for the difference between the starting and final weight divided by the duration of the stage. The gross air sac lesions were scored on a scale of 0 to 4 at necropsy, using a modification of a system described previously 57 . Tracheal tissues were collected from the upper, middle, and lower for histopathologic examination as described previously 58 .…”
Section: Clinical Observation Lesion Score Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%