1994
DOI: 10.1080/15235882.1994.10162665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Implementing Classroom Instructional Models on English Language Learners' Cognitive and Affective Outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As much as possible, effect sizes were calculated for each grade when multiple grades were included within a study (e.g., Lightbown, Halter, & White, 2002). However, many of the studies with participants in multiple grades did not report sufficient statistical information to calculate effect size per grade (e.g., Calderón et al , 1998; Denton, Anthony, Parker, & Hasbrouck, 2004; Slavin & Madden, 1999; Troia, 2004, Waxman, DeFelix, & Martinez, 1994). Literacy strategies produced heterogeneous but statistically detectable mean effect sizes for all educational grades, excluding studies conducted with participants in multiple grades.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As much as possible, effect sizes were calculated for each grade when multiple grades were included within a study (e.g., Lightbown, Halter, & White, 2002). However, many of the studies with participants in multiple grades did not report sufficient statistical information to calculate effect size per grade (e.g., Calderón et al , 1998; Denton, Anthony, Parker, & Hasbrouck, 2004; Slavin & Madden, 1999; Troia, 2004, Waxman, DeFelix, & Martinez, 1994). Literacy strategies produced heterogeneous but statistically detectable mean effect sizes for all educational grades, excluding studies conducted with participants in multiple grades.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Problems in implementation of the intervention approaches that require extensive natural language and authentic dialogue, such as CALLA and Instructional Conversations, may help explain why they failed to result in effects in reading. The implementation problems that plagued the large-scale research study by Waxman et al (1994), for example, were consistently corroborated in the professional work groups. Participants talked about weak, inconsistent, and sometimes incoherent implementation of techniques such as semantic mapping, cooperative learning, and.…”
Section: Relevantfindings From Researchmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In the exploratory meta-analysis (Baker & Gersten, 1997), we noted that often the instructional interventions with the largest effects in reading and mathematics were heavily rooted in principles verified by the instructional research literature of the 1980s and early 1990s. These approaches included classwide peer tutoring (Delquadri, Greenwood, Whorton, Carta, & Hall, 1986); the Stallings (1980) Effective Use of Time, (used in Waxman et al, 1994); the "tailoring of feedback" used for mathematical problem-solving (Cardelle- Elawar, 1990); and the provision of focused and explicit instruction on math concepts by Henderson and Landesman (l995). In particular, provision of frequent, clear feedback to students seemed critical.…”
Section: Relationship Between Promising Approaches and The Knowledge Base On Effective Teaching (Theme Two)mentioning
confidence: 99%