2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-6226(03)00119-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of increasing concentrate energy supply on the performance of loose-housed dairy cows fed grass silage-based diets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
8
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are two possible reasons for this: firstly, the high levels of dietary concentrate supplementation of the stabled camels compared to the grazing camels. This is consistent with previous reports on dairy cattle, where increasing the concentrate to roughage ratio was observed to increase milk production substantially (Kuoppala et al 2004), DM and energy intake (Beyero et al 2015), and apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, CF, NDF and ADF fractions (Beyero et al 2015), while decreasing the growth of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria (Grant and Mertens, 1992) and milk fat percentage (Bauman et al 2008). The high level of concentrate in the diet gives rise to more propionic acid instead of acetic acid in the rumen, which in turn promotes partitioning of energy towards synthesis of body fat instead of milk fat, resulting ultimately in decreased milk fat (McDonald et al 2010).…”
Section: Influence Of the Management Systemsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…There are two possible reasons for this: firstly, the high levels of dietary concentrate supplementation of the stabled camels compared to the grazing camels. This is consistent with previous reports on dairy cattle, where increasing the concentrate to roughage ratio was observed to increase milk production substantially (Kuoppala et al 2004), DM and energy intake (Beyero et al 2015), and apparent digestibilities of DM, OM, CF, NDF and ADF fractions (Beyero et al 2015), while decreasing the growth of ruminal cellulolytic bacteria (Grant and Mertens, 1992) and milk fat percentage (Bauman et al 2008). The high level of concentrate in the diet gives rise to more propionic acid instead of acetic acid in the rumen, which in turn promotes partitioning of energy towards synthesis of body fat instead of milk fat, resulting ultimately in decreased milk fat (McDonald et al 2010).…”
Section: Influence Of the Management Systemsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Moorby et al (2006) reported that an increase in milk yield of nearly 8 kg/day was observed when dietary energy intake was increased along with increased DMI (>7 kg/day) by increasing concentrate to forage ratio from 20 : 80 to 65 : 35. A similar increase in milk yield with increased energy intake was also reported in two other studies (Rinne et al 1999;Kuoppala et al 2004). The milk yield increments observed in the present Latin square study were not as high as those observed by the above researchers, probably due mainly to feed intake restriction.…”
Section: Effect Of Dietary Neutral Detergent Fibre : Crude Protein Rasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The consequence of increased feed intake with increasing concentrate inclusion in the diet was a significant increase in milk yield (of 7.7 kg/d, or 45% in proportional terms). This was expected, because increased milk yields are a common (Hansen et al, 1991;Rinne et al, 1999;Yang et al, 2001), but not inevitable (Kuoppala et al, 2004), result of increasing the proportion of concentrate in the diet. Similarly, milk protein concentration is often found to be increased as concentrate intake increases (Mayne and Gordon, 1984;Rinne et al, 1999;Yang et al, 2001), as was found in the present study.…”
Section: Feed Intake and Milk Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was despite a significant (more than 2 kg/d) reduction in silage intake (−33%), although this was far outweighed by the (366%) increase in concentrate intake. Increased total DMI is often (Sloan et al, 1988;Friggens et al, 1998a;Kuoppala et al, 2004), but not always (Hansen et al, 1991), found when the concentrate portion of a dairy cow's diet is increased, and a substitution effect is frequently obtained with large changes in the F:C ratio. As a result of the relatively low quality of grass silage, the effect of concentrate intake in terms of a reduction of silage intake was quantitatively less important than the additive effect of concentrate intake, leading to greater total DMI at the high inclusion rates of concentrate in the diet, as indicated by Broster and Thomas (1981).…”
Section: Feed Intake and Milk Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%