1995
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0434.1995.tb00663.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Induced Resistance on Disease Severity/Yield Relations in Mildewed Barley

Abstract: Field experiments showed that the treatment of winter barley with microbia! metabolites produced by a Bacillus subtilis strain led to increased yields in spite of a remaining mildew infection. Disease severity yield relations obtained on a single tiller basis for either mildew infection at EC 75 or area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) were negatively correlated for untreated plants (R-= 89%, 94%) while this relation did not exist for inducer-treated ones {R'= 10%, 13%). Despite an increasing infection den… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In field experiments, treatment of winter barley with an elicitor of SAR produced by a Bacillus subtilis strain led to increased yield after infection with Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei, which could not be accounted for by the reduction in disease severity alone (11). Thus, the possibility of cotton yield enhancement with harpin induced SAR appears to be scientifically based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In field experiments, treatment of winter barley with an elicitor of SAR produced by a Bacillus subtilis strain led to increased yield after infection with Blumeria graminis f.sp. hordei, which could not be accounted for by the reduction in disease severity alone (11). Thus, the possibility of cotton yield enhancement with harpin induced SAR appears to be scientifically based.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These data suggest therefore that induction of systemic resistance to rust infection using saccharin has limited impact on plant growth. This agrees with other work which showed that application of various agents to induce resistance in barley was not associated with reductions in plant growth and yield (Dehne et al ., 1984;Steiner et al ., 1988;Oerke et al ., 1989;Kehlenbeck et al ., 1994;Mitchell & Walters, 1995). It remains to be seen whether induction of resistance in broad bean using saccharin has an effect on yield, because this was not determined in the present work.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, in a field experiment the overall height of barley was reduced when resistance was induced with methyl jasmonate, although there was a significant increase in yield (Mitchell & Walters, 1995). An increase in yield was also apparent when resistance was induced in barley by application of various agents (Dehne et al ., 1984;Steiner et al ., 1988;Oerke et al ., 1989;Kehlenbeck et al ., 1994). For field application of agents to induce resistance, an important consideration, in addition to the ability to control disease, is the effect on plant growth and yield.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This confirms the idea that bacterial isolates unable to form inhibition zones on solid medium are not necessarily incapable of inhibiting disease development in vivo . Bacillus subtilis J9 isolate may assume its antagonistic effect by mainly producing cell‐bound antifungal compounds (Edwards, 1993; Walker et al., 1998) or indirectly by inducing plant resistance mechanisms and/or by nutrient competition (Kehlenbeck et al., 1994; Muninbazi and Bullerman, 1998). The coordinated action of chitinases and proteases, produced by B .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%