1976
DOI: 10.1037/0022-0167.23.4.316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of information feedback and self-administered consequences on self-monitoring study behavior.

Abstract: instructor, whilc 4 sections were taught by a prescriptive approach stressing preestablishcd learning prescriptions based upon diagnostic findings, use of reading laboratory materials and machines. and minimal conversation.Analyses of variance were used to compare the personalized and prescriptive groups on reading rate. vocabulary, comprehension, and reading interest before and after the course. Both groups showed significant gains on all four measures, and neither group showed greater gains than the other on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

1977
1977
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Richards (1974Richards ( , 1975, for example, found evidence that self-monitoring can help college students to improve their academic performance when utilized as an adjunct to study skills training. This finding was replicated by Richards, McReynolds, Holt, and Sexton (1976). The authors found a significantly higher mean improvement in GPA over both study skills advice alone and attention placebo and no-contact control groups.…”
Section: Self-monitoringsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Richards (1974Richards ( , 1975, for example, found evidence that self-monitoring can help college students to improve their academic performance when utilized as an adjunct to study skills training. This finding was replicated by Richards, McReynolds, Holt, and Sexton (1976). The authors found a significantly higher mean improvement in GPA over both study skills advice alone and attention placebo and no-contact control groups.…”
Section: Self-monitoringsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In fact, it could be said that each person knows something about a portion of his own behavior, but that the systematization produced by the self-monitoring induces a new, more accurate awareness of the actual situation. This hypothesis is strongly supported by the results reported by Richards, McReynolds, Holt, and Sexton (1976) which show that subjects who are less informed about their own study behavior benefit more from self-monitoring than those whose information is -already more accurate. Self-monitoring is also often part of a more general intervention strategy referred to as self-control.…”
Section: Self-monitoringsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…However, Richards, McReynolds, Holt, and Sexton (1976) recently gave data on a successful behavioral program in w h~c h the increase in study time averaged 1.04 hours per day The .72 hours gain reported by the present students represents a useful lmprovement. although somewhat less than In the case of the Richards behavior modification program which had study as the sole target behavior The most successful program dealing with nervous habits would appear to be that of Azrin and Nunn (1973) who reported a 99% reduction for a variety of nervous habits by the third week of treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%