1984
DOI: 10.1002/nur.4770070312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Information on Patient Stereotyping

Abstract: The influence of information on nurse attitudes and behavior toward a member of a stereotyped group was investigated. Responsibility for the decision to be childless and the intelligence of the person making that decision were manipulated. Student nurses individually interacted with a hypothetical, childless, female patient, presented via audiotape, who was about to undergo surgery for sterilization. The patient was described (a) as seeking sterilization either voluntarily or because of medical necessity, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantitative studies used questionnaires or other test instruments ( n =42) as their data collection method, either alone or in combination with evaluations or ratings of videotaped interviews, interactions or role‐play ( n =4), ratings of audiotaped interviews or interactions ( n =4), semistructured interviews ( n =1), participant observation ( n =1), process recordings ( n =1) or responses to case presentations ( n =1). Stimuli (for example, slides, audiotapes, videotapes or written case studies) were sometimes applied prior to the participant’s answering the questionnaire (Devellis et al . 1984, Brettell 1987, Davis & Jameton 1987, Haggerty 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantitative studies used questionnaires or other test instruments ( n =42) as their data collection method, either alone or in combination with evaluations or ratings of videotaped interviews, interactions or role‐play ( n =4), ratings of audiotaped interviews or interactions ( n =4), semistructured interviews ( n =1), participant observation ( n =1), process recordings ( n =1) or responses to case presentations ( n =1). Stimuli (for example, slides, audiotapes, videotapes or written case studies) were sometimes applied prior to the participant’s answering the questionnaire (Devellis et al . 1984, Brettell 1987, Davis & Jameton 1987, Haggerty 1987).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, in the DeVellis, Adams, and DeVellis (1984) study person-centeredness of verbal responses was evaluated, and in the present study, Response Modes of written responses were coded. Second, in the DeVellis et al (1984) study, students' attitudes toward retarded and nonretarded women seeking sterilization were assessed. There could be a stronger negative stereotype held toward women seeking sterilization than toward unmarried pregnant women seeking prenatal care, which would explain the differing results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, verbal responses by the nursing students were coded by one of three researchers with a coding scheme developed by Matthews (1962) and modified by DeVellis, Adams, and DeVellis (1984) that was designed to measure the person-centered quality of nurse responses to patients. Verbal responses were divided into individual utterances that were rated for person-centeredness on a scale from 1 to 5, with more person-centered responses receiving lower ratings.…”
Section: Patient Recollection Instrument (Pri)mentioning
confidence: 99%