2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of initial crack positions and load levels on creep failure behavior in P92 steel welded joint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is reasonable to regard the maximum principle stress as the equivalent damage stress in a situation of multi-axial stress when the creep damage course is dominated by micro-cracks and cavity mechanism [11][12][13].…”
Section: Analysis Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reasonable to regard the maximum principle stress as the equivalent damage stress in a situation of multi-axial stress when the creep damage course is dominated by micro-cracks and cavity mechanism [11][12][13].…”
Section: Analysis Of Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14) and (16). In addition, the damage accumulation in the interface zone by cavitation is still a displacement-based ductility exhaustion criterion [36][37][38][39][40][41] but is no longer a sole function of the normal creep separation as used in our previous work [8].…”
Section: Interface Region (Creep Cavity Growth)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The material constraint is due to the mismatch effect of creep properties in the welded joint components. There are a number of experimental and numerical studies on the influence of the mismatch effect on the fracture mechanics parameter C* and the CCG rate in welded joints [9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%