1971
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.en.16.010171.001445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Insect Defoliation on Growth and Mortality of Trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
189
0
6

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 329 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
7
189
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Many published works have described the effect of natural or artificial defoliation on the growth of trees. The needle loss there has always been described as the loss from any particular needle set (Kulman, 1971;Ericsson et al, 1980;Armour et al, 2003) or as the loss from the total green foliage (Alfaro et al, 1982;Williams et al, 2003). When the rate of defoliation is inaccurately defined, it is clear that the relationship between the needle loss and growth rate can be based only on correlations and cannot prove cause and effect (Armour et al, 2003) or open sink and source (Honkanen et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many published works have described the effect of natural or artificial defoliation on the growth of trees. The needle loss there has always been described as the loss from any particular needle set (Kulman, 1971;Ericsson et al, 1980;Armour et al, 2003) or as the loss from the total green foliage (Alfaro et al, 1982;Williams et al, 2003). When the rate of defoliation is inaccurately defined, it is clear that the relationship between the needle loss and growth rate can be based only on correlations and cannot prove cause and effect (Armour et al, 2003) or open sink and source (Honkanen et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accumulation of minor damage can negatively affect trees by diverting resources to repairing damage (Kulman 1971, Brooks & Bell 2002 or by causing mortality (Kulman 1971, Ozaki et al 1999). Many of these trees also exhibited changes in root and canopy architecture related to isopod damage, including fewer supportive aerial roots and smaller and fewer pneumatophores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Come è noto, la perdita di gran parte o di tutta la superficie fogliare assimilante determina in un albero una riduzione di incremento legnoso del tronco oltre che, parallelamente, una complessa serie di modificazioni fisiologiche che possono portare ad accresciuta sensibilità verso altri stress di natura biotica e abiotica (Kulman 1971, Pollard 1972. Ne consegue che la pioppicoltura specializzata italiana, attività agricola finalizzata alla produzione di legno di elevata qualità per l'industria, soffre un danno economico dalla riduzione quantitativa del prodotto legnoso causata da defogliazioni di varia natura, anche se è noto che i danni economicamente più importanti patiti dalla pioppicoltura sono legati allo scadimento qualitativo del legno causato da attacchi di parassiti lignicoli e corticali (Arru 1968).…”
Section: Introduzioneunclassified