2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of inter-individual lumbar spine geometry variation on load-sharing: Geometrically personalized Finite Element study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 4 (upper left), Wood et al (1996), and Meakin et al (2009). Contrary to existing literature on the influence of curvature on spinal loading (Briggs et al, 2007;Bruno et al, 2012Bruno et al, , 2017Galbusera et al, 2014;Naserkhaki et al, 2016), the novelty of our study lies in the formulation of quantitative statements regarding the LL-dependent load distribution during forward dynamic simulations, e.g., "Per one degree increase in LL, the compressive force within the IVD between L5 and SA decreases by 2.8 N (CI: [−4.6, −1] N)." Of course, our absolute output values have to be treated with caution when comparing them directly to in vivo (or more elaborated in silico) situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 4 (upper left), Wood et al (1996), and Meakin et al (2009). Contrary to existing literature on the influence of curvature on spinal loading (Briggs et al, 2007;Bruno et al, 2012Bruno et al, , 2017Galbusera et al, 2014;Naserkhaki et al, 2016), the novelty of our study lies in the formulation of quantitative statements regarding the LL-dependent load distribution during forward dynamic simulations, e.g., "Per one degree increase in LL, the compressive force within the IVD between L5 and SA decreases by 2.8 N (CI: [−4.6, −1] N)." Of course, our absolute output values have to be treated with caution when comparing them directly to in vivo (or more elaborated in silico) situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On average, an increase of one degree LL was associated with an increase of ~0.74° in PI and 0.62° in SS, which well corresponds to literature data—cf. Roussouly et al ( 2005 , Tables 1, 2) and Naserkhaki et al ( 2016 , Figure 1). For ΔPILL, we found a decrease of 0.26° per degree LL, which has, to our knowledge, not yet been reported.…”
Section: Model and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…e size of the intervertebral foramen is closely related to the normal physiological morphology of spinal nerves and blood vessels, and some studies have shown that intervertebral disc degeneration is closely related to the height and area of the intervertebral foramen [19][20][21][22]. In this study, we analyzed the stress changes of the degenerative L4-5 intervertebral disc during pushing to a height of 0-10 cm and also analyzed the height and area of intervertebral foramen in these biomechanical environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study examined the immediate effect of prolonged deep squatting on the lumbopelvic kinematics and muscle recruitment using the simulated deep squatting position, in which stress to lower limbs was reduced by having to support their body weight over their buttocks. A previous study suggested that curvature of the spine would alter both the location and magnitude of load on the spinal tissues [ 28 ]. Therefore, variation of the spinal curvature during deep squatting position in this study, if present, would have influenced the load sharing within the spinal tissues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%