Effects of Interfaces on Human-Robot Trust: Specifying and Visualizing Physical Zones

Mitigating Overtrust Towards Robot in Mixed Reality Interfaces

“…Trust is the willingness to be vulnerable to another's actions [4,16]. It can be influenced by automation characteristics [5], design elements [6,9] and individual qualities [7]. Trust can lead to cooperation [8,[16][17].…”

“…We use MR to address this issue. Interfaces affect trust levels [6]. AR interface is preferred for its low cognitive load and physical benefits [6].…”

“…Interfaces affect trust levels [6]. AR interface is preferred for its low cognitive load and physical benefits [6]. MR allows virtual agents to interact with people and physical robots in realistic and engaging ways [20][21][22].…”

“…We define trust as the willingness to be vulnerable to another party's actions [3][4]. Trust can be influenced by automation characteristics [5], design elements [6] and individual qualities [7]. Trust is similar but not identical in human-human and human-agent interactions [8].…”

“…One way to calibrate trust is to facilitate human-agent collaboration by allocating tasks within the system [13]. Collaboration can improve performance [14], prevent overtrust [5] and enhance situational awareness [6,15]. This paper explores how trust are influenced by system performance and agent intents in a home robot system.…”