In laboratory rock testing, there are three approaches to emulate the three-dimensional subsurface in situ stress states namely, the conventional triaxial compression test, polyaxial compression test, and triaxial extension test. The conventional triaxial compression test has the limitation that the minimum principal stress 3 E is always equal to the intermediate principal stress 2
E; polyaxial compression test overcomes the above-mentioned limitation and creates three unequal compressive principal stresses; neither conventional compression test nor polyaxial compression test can create tensile principal stress. Triaxial extension test can create a tensile principal stress but has the limitation that the intermediate principal stress 2
Eequals the maximum principal stress 1 .
ETriaxial (confined) Brazilian test is a cost-effective alternative to the conventional triaxial extension test with samples of dog-bone geometry; it overcomes the limitation of the conventional triaxial extension test by creating three unequal principal stresses at the center of the Brazilian disc. There are many cases where rock behavior in the confined tension region is of interest, e.g., wellbore breakouts, rock-bursts and spalling can occur under confined tensile stress state (Hoek & Martin, 2014). The extent of excavation damage zone is greatly affected by the tensile strength measured in confined tension conditions and additionally, hydraulic fracturing also occurs in confined tension stress conditions.