2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-013-9829-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intermediate principal stress on tensile strength of rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
6
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
3
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the second and third subcategories share the same compression and extension meridians with the conventional HB criterion and thus give a TXC strength same as the triaxial extension (TXE) strength as well as an equal biaxial compression as the uniaxial compression strengths. However, many experimental tests of rocks have already revealed that TXE strength is generally higher by 10%–20% than TXC strength 4,35–38 . Similar findings are also reported for concrete materials.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In summary, the second and third subcategories share the same compression and extension meridians with the conventional HB criterion and thus give a TXC strength same as the triaxial extension (TXE) strength as well as an equal biaxial compression as the uniaxial compression strengths. However, many experimental tests of rocks have already revealed that TXE strength is generally higher by 10%–20% than TXC strength 4,35–38 . Similar findings are also reported for concrete materials.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…However, many experimental tests of rocks have already revealed that TXE strength is generally higher by 10%-20% than TXC strength. 4,[35][36][37][38] Similar findings are also reported for concrete materials. For example, triaxial experiments on concrete cylinders clearly demonstrates that a substantial difference of shear strength in TXC and TXE states, which diminishes with increasing confinement 39 ; equal biaxial compression strength of concrete is around 15%-16% higher than uniaxial compression strength.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…where (14) and (15) into Equation 1and considering that z = x + iy, α + β = 90°, the stress solution for the chordwise loading is obtained as follows:…”
Section: Advances In Mathematical Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the current research results, tensile strength measured by a splitting test is still quite discrete and is affected by many factors, such as the thickness of disc specimen, the contact mode of the load, and the size of the spacer. For example, aiming at the size effect [14][15][16][17] caused by the thickness to diameter ratio, the result shows that the tensile stress on the axle wire of the disc is not a constant but a high-end, low-middle distribution, with an obvious spatial effect. At the same time, the compression failure near the loading point of the disc violates the hypothesis of the initiation of the crack from the center of the disc due to the strong stress concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the pertinent literature shows only a limited number of strength data points in the tensile domain (Hagengruber et al, 2021;Jaeger, 1963;Ramsey & Chester, 2004), and the shape of strength envelopes in the tensile domain has not been thoroughly investigated. Phueakphum et al (2013) found that tensile strength of rocks increases with intermediate principal stress using four-point bending test and biaxial flexural test. The dog-bone shaped rock samples were used to test the tensile behavior of Carrara marble (Ramsey & Chester, 2004;Rodriguez, 2005), Berea sandstone (Bobich, 2005) and Longmaxi Shale (Lan et al, 2019) under confining pressure, their dataset also demonstrate an increase of tensile strength with confining pressure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%