2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intermetallic compound layer thickness on the mechanical properties of silicon-copper interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between Cu and Ti atoms is initially zero when no heat is applied to the Cu–Ti dissimilar interface [Figure 4(c)]. Because both the Cu crystal [face centred cubic (FCC)] and α-Ti crystal (HCP) have the same packing factor of 0.74, therefore, both of them have almost similar activation energy (approximately 195 KJ/mol) to start the diffusion mechanism in each other (Ji et al , 2021; Pugh, 2009; Zhu et al , 2016). The α -Ti generally crystallises at room temperature, whereas the β -Ti, having a body-centered cubic (BCC) crystal structure, crystallises at high temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between Cu and Ti atoms is initially zero when no heat is applied to the Cu–Ti dissimilar interface [Figure 4(c)]. Because both the Cu crystal [face centred cubic (FCC)] and α-Ti crystal (HCP) have the same packing factor of 0.74, therefore, both of them have almost similar activation energy (approximately 195 KJ/mol) to start the diffusion mechanism in each other (Ji et al , 2021; Pugh, 2009; Zhu et al , 2016). The α -Ti generally crystallises at room temperature, whereas the β -Ti, having a body-centered cubic (BCC) crystal structure, crystallises at high temperature.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[27], the MEAM potential parameters of element pairs (each pair interaction is characterized by a total of 13 parameters) are shown in Table 2 . This potential is used by Ji et al [ 28 ] to evaluate the elastic–plastic behavior and adhesion behavior of the Si/Cu interface. Hue et al [ 29 ] used this potential to investigate the effect of strain rate on the mechanical properties of nanomultilayered aluminum 5052 alloys.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By understanding how different factors, such as layer thickness, composition, and interface characteristics, influence the plastic deformation, strategies can be developed to enhance the composite’s resistance to deformation, and the microstructure and properties of composites can be tailored to meet specific application requirements [ 24 , 25 ]. Extensive research efforts have been devoted to investigating the plastic deformation behaviour of materials on the nanoscale under various conditions, including grain size [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], strain rate [ 31 , 32 , 33 ], grain boundaries (GBs), and interfacial interactions [ 5 , 23 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 ]. For instance, Liu [ 30 ] utilised the molecular dynamics (MDs) method to examine the plastic deformation phenomenon of nano-polycrystalline Mg, and observed the inverse Hall–Petch relation at the grain sizes below 10 nm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%