2014
DOI: 10.1177/0022429414530434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Novices’ Rehearsal Evaluations

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of internal and external focus of attention on novices’ rehearsal evaluations. Thirty-two undergraduate instrumental music education students led bands in a series of three 6-minute rehearsals on their assigned excerpt. Prior to these rehearsals, participants were led in score study and rehearsal preparation activities. Internal group ( n = 16) participants’ preparation related to knowledge of the score, whereas external group ( n = 16) participants focu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were provided with a brief vignette describing each performing ensemble on the stimulus recording (including number of musicians). Following precedent in previous research studies (Montemayor & Moss, 2009; Silvey & Montemayor, 2014), we used Bergee’s (1995) three primary factors for concert band adjudication. Immediately following each vignette, an evaluation form appeared with which participants assessed the primary factors of ensemble tone quality/intonation, musicianship/expression, and rhythm/articulation on a 10-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 1 = poor to 10 = excellent ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were provided with a brief vignette describing each performing ensemble on the stimulus recording (including number of musicians). Following precedent in previous research studies (Montemayor & Moss, 2009; Silvey & Montemayor, 2014), we used Bergee’s (1995) three primary factors for concert band adjudication. Immediately following each vignette, an evaluation form appeared with which participants assessed the primary factors of ensemble tone quality/intonation, musicianship/expression, and rhythm/articulation on a 10-point Likert-type scale (ranging from 1 = poor to 10 = excellent ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of recordings on the score study process itself, however, seems to be a new area of inquiry. Anecdotal evidence from previous research studies (see Montemayor & Moss, 2009;Silvey & Montemayor, 2014) and our own experiences as teacher educators suggest that novice conductors prefer to have a model recording when possible, and it seems likely that the answers to our research questions (i.e., how novices generate an internal aural image from a conductor score) could look very different in either the presence or the absence of such a recording. Given that recordings (albeit of varying quality) of many selections from contemporary band repertoire are now more readily available than ever via commercial recordings and as YouTube videos (Whitaker, Orman, & Yarbrough, 2014), knowing how such recordings might affect novices' score study processes and their subsequent conducting performance seems important for developing and refining score study instruction in university conducting preparation programs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Although previous researchers have examined the content of students’ reflections on their teaching (Baumgartner, 2011; Silvey & Montemayor, 2014; Stegman, 2007), none have used psycholinguistic analysis—defined by Crystal (2008) as the study of how language relates to underlying psychological processes—to investigate the reflections of preservice music teachers. By categorizing and quantifying elements of language through psycholinguistic inquiry, researchers have found that the frequency with which people use certain types of words in written or spoken discourse can reveal a surprising amount about their personality, personal relationships, emotional states, and focus of attention.…”
Section: Psycholinguistic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%