Effects of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Physical Activity Breaks on Blood Glucose, Insulin and Triacylglycerol Measures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Background Physical activity (PA) breaks in sitting time might attenuate metabolic markers relevant to the prevention of type 2 diabetes. Objectives The primary aim of this paper was to systematically review and meta-analyse trials that compared the effects of breaking up prolonged sitting with bouts of PA throughout the day (INT) versus continuous sitting (SIT) on glucose, insulin and triacylglycerol (TAG) measures. A second aim was to compare the effects of INT versus continuous exercise (EX) on glucose, insulin and TAG measures. Methods The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) recommendations. Eligibility criteria consisted of trials comparing INT vs. SIT or INT vs. one bout of EX before or after sitting, in participants aged 18 or above, who were classified as either metabolically healthy or impaired, but not with other major health conditions such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or peripheral arterial disease. Results A total of 42 studies were included in the overall review, whereas a total of 37 studies were included in the metaanalysis. There was a standardised mean difference (SMD) of − 0.54 (95% CI − 0.70, − 0.37, p = 0.00001) in favour of INT compared to SIT for glucose. With respect to insulin, there was an SMD of − 0.56 (95% CI − 0.74, − 0.38, p = 0.00001) in favour of INT. For TAG, there was an SMD of − 0.26 (95% CI − 0.44, − 0.09, p = 0.002) in favour of INT. Body mass index (BMI) was associated with glucose responses (β = − 0.05, 95% CI − 0.09, − 0.01, p = 0.01), and insulin (β = − 0.05, 95% CI − 0.10, − 0.006, p = 0.03), but not TAG (β = 0.02, 95% CI − 0.02, 0.06, p = 0.37). When energy expenditure was matched, there was an SMD of − 0.26 (95% CI − 0.50, − 0.02, p = 0.03) in favour of INT for glucose, but no statistically significant SMDs for insulin, i.e. 0.35 (95% CI − 0.37, 1.07, p = 0.35), or TAG i.e. 0.08 (95% CI − 0.22, 0.37, p = 0.62). It is worth noting that there was possible publication bias for TAG outcomes when PA breaks were compared with sitting. Conclusion The use of PA breaks during sitting moderately attenuated post-prandial glucose, insulin, and TAG, with greater glycaemic attenuation in people with higher BMI. There was a statistically significant small advantage for PA breaks over continuous exercise for attenuating glucose measures when exercise protocols were energy matched, but no statistically significant differences for insulin and TAG. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42017080982. PROSPERO Registration CRD42017080982. Key PointsBreaking up sitting with physical activity (PA) moderately attenuated post-prandial glucose and insulin, with a small effect size attenuation for TAG.There was greater glycaemic attenuation in people with higher body mass index (BMI).PA breaks were slightly more effective for glycaemic attenuation compared to one continuous bout of PA when experimental conditions were energy expenditure matched. Affiliations

Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses

“…8 It has largely been acute laboratory interventions (<7 days) using structured protocols providing experimental evidence that reducing or breaking up sitting can have beneficial effects on certain cardiometabolic biomarkers. [9][10][11][12] For example, compared with uninterrupted sitting time, adding short bouts of light or moderate intensity activity every 20-30 min (generally over a period of 1-5 days) results in improvements to resting blood pressure, 13 14 fasting and postprandial glucose 15 16 and insulin, 15 17 18 and some lipids. 19 In recognition of the aforementioned evidence, several countries now, in addition to having guidelines concerning physical activity, include guidelines to reduce the quantity of sedentary behaviour and/ or break it up.…”

<p>Antidiabetic Effects of Physical Activity: How It Helps to Control Type 2 Diabetes</p>

“…54 The use of PA breaks during sitting moderately reduces post-prandial glucose, insulin, and triacylglycerol, with a better glycaemic reduction in individuals with a high body mass index (BMI). 55 The integration of dietary and PA is significant in diabetes improvement which may encourage to prevent or delay diabetes complications. 56,57 And also, the combined intervention of supervised structured exercise training and caloric restriction are effective in improving metabolic health and decreasing an excess weight in obese patients with T2DM.…”

Metabolic health and lifestyle medicine should be a cornerstone of future pandemic preparedness

“…Coined by Francois et al in 2014, 75 small regular movement or exercise "snacks" (eg, 2-6 min of simple movement every 30-60 min or before meals) are associated with improved glycemic control, including when compared to energy-matched long single training sessions. 76 Simple walking is also associated with decreased mortality that plateaus around 10 000 steps per day. 77 Beyond that, both resistance training (and resulting improvements in strength and muscle mass) and aerobic exercise are associated with reduced risk of obesity, hypertension, metabolic disease, and survival after critical illness.…”