2014
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of interruptions of controlled‐rate freezing on the viability of umbilical cord blood stem cells

Abstract: Cord blood samples can be transferred to a -80°C freezer anytime during controlled-rate cooling, but should only be transferred to LNVP when the samples have been cooled to -40°C or lower. Percent postthaw survival of CFU-GM should be routinely assessed when controlled-rate cooling is interrupted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study the number of viable CD34 + cells was not significantly reduced under any of the conditions tested, but CFU-GM were specifically and significantly lower if cryopreservation using a CRF was interrupted at different temperature points and cells transferred directly to LNVP (usually below À150°C) if the cells had not reached a sufficiently low temperature (À40°C) before the transfer. In contrast, no significant differences were seen in CFU-GM or CD34 + cell viability in paired samples transferred to a À80°C mechanical freezer from the CRF at any temperature point (Yang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study the number of viable CD34 + cells was not significantly reduced under any of the conditions tested, but CFU-GM were specifically and significantly lower if cryopreservation using a CRF was interrupted at different temperature points and cells transferred directly to LNVP (usually below À150°C) if the cells had not reached a sufficiently low temperature (À40°C) before the transfer. In contrast, no significant differences were seen in CFU-GM or CD34 + cell viability in paired samples transferred to a À80°C mechanical freezer from the CRF at any temperature point (Yang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In particular, cooling after the transition phase greater than 5-6°C/min has been reported to be associated with CFU-GM loss and delayed re-engraftment after reinfusion into patients (Abrams et al, 1980;Gorin et al, 1983). In contrast, no significant differences were seen in CFU-GM or CD34 + cell viability in paired samples transferred to a À80°C mechanical freezer from the CRF at any temperature point (Yang et al, 2015). The CRF programme in use at GOSH since the early 1990s was established when bone marrow was the exclusive stem cell source at the time of these early reports and it is possible that the more recent use of PBSC could be a factor A recent study using umbilical cord blood (UCB) confirms the negative impact of excessively rapid cooling and may be relevant to the clinical incident as an example of major CFU-GM activity loss without comparable CD34 + cell death related to rapid freezing conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although rare, malfunction or failure of the controlled-rate freezing device is a potential risk. One interesting study examined the effects of interruptions of controlled-rate freezing on the viability of umbilical cord cells in order to provide guidance of the proper response in case of freezing device failure [76]. There was no difference in post-thaw survival between the temperature at which cooling was interrupted if cells were transferred to a –80°C freezer; however, cells should only be transferred to vapor nitrogen when the interrupting temperature was lower than –40°C.…”
Section: Additional Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, Yang et al () explored the rapid post freeze cooling of cord blood samples to ascertain the outcome of transferring frozen cells directly in vapour phase liquid nitrogen should a programmable rate freezer break down at any time. Rapid post‐freeze cooling was deleterious to GM‐CFC recovery unless the cells were already at −40°C or below at the time of transfer to vapour phase nitrogen.…”
Section: Cryoprotectant and Cryopreservation Cooling Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%