2006
DOI: 10.1899/0887-3593(2006)25[656:eoirac]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of interstitial refugia and current velocity on growth of the amphipodGammarus pulexLinnaeus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for the observed size differences are likely to include, not necessarily in order of importance: more and better quality food (larger substrate enhances coarse particulate organic matter retention; Lepori et al 2005, and increased flow can stimulated periphyton growth; Opsahl et al 2003), greater interstitial spaces for protection from predators (the common goby), and better oxygenated water (Hynes 1970) at the faster-water site. For G. pulex, it has been shown that growth is higher at a higher current velocity, and that, although food consumption is lower, individual growth is higher among larger substrate particles (gravel versus sand) (Franken et al 2006). For G. pseudolimnaeus, activity and oxygen uptake have been observed to be lower among preferred substrate particle sizes, compared with non-preferred sizes (Rees 1972), and the presence of suitable substrate interstices is critical to microhabitat selection (Olyslager and Williams 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for the observed size differences are likely to include, not necessarily in order of importance: more and better quality food (larger substrate enhances coarse particulate organic matter retention; Lepori et al 2005, and increased flow can stimulated periphyton growth; Opsahl et al 2003), greater interstitial spaces for protection from predators (the common goby), and better oxygenated water (Hynes 1970) at the faster-water site. For G. pulex, it has been shown that growth is higher at a higher current velocity, and that, although food consumption is lower, individual growth is higher among larger substrate particles (gravel versus sand) (Franken et al 2006). For G. pseudolimnaeus, activity and oxygen uptake have been observed to be lower among preferred substrate particle sizes, compared with non-preferred sizes (Rees 1972), and the presence of suitable substrate interstices is critical to microhabitat selection (Olyslager and Williams 1993).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gammarus pulex, for example prefers moderate flows around 25 cm s -1 (Peeters and Gardeniers 1998;Franken et al 2006), and G. pseudolimnaeus prefers a similar level (20-25 cm s -1 ), combined with larger substrate particles which provides larger interstitial refuges (Williams and Moore 1982). While some of the demonstrated benefits of such microhabitat preferences include increased growth and predator protection, this study indicates that there may be implication for mate choice in that larger males predominate at faster-water/large substrate sites where they breed with larger, presumably more fecund, females.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substrate choice and activity patterns of gammarids can be influenced by a number of factors such as age of the gammarid and time of day (Elliott 2005), structure of substrates and physical and chemical parameters in the environment (Wijnhoven et al 2003;Palmer and Ricciardi 2004;Franken et al 2006;McGrath et al 2007), availability of food (van Dolah 1978;Dahl and Greenberg 1996;De Lange et al 2005;McGrath et al 2007), presence/absence of parasites in gammarids (Mazzi and Bakker 2003;Kaldonski et al 2007), presence/absence/density of predators or predator odors and age of predators (Mathis and Hoback 1997;Dahl and Greenberg 1996;Wudkevich et al 1997;Max Neil et al 1999;Sudo and Azeta 2001;Baumgärtner et al 2002Baumgärtner et al , 2003Pennuto and Keppler 2008) and presence/absence of conspecifics (van Riel et al 2007;Piscart et al 2007). We conducted the substrate-choice experiments in the absence of predators, parasites and food (except macrophytes) and both test species faced the same physical and chemical conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many benthic organisms are associated with coarse woody habitat (Hoffmann and Hering 2000) or are known to show preferences for certain ranges of velocity (Wellnitz et al 2001;Franken et al 2006). Wood provides hard and persistent surfaces for colonization by macroinvertebrates and may be less subject to burial by flow-driven sediments than mineral substrates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%