1992
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/85.3.335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Intracolonial Genetic Diversity on Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Colony Performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
72
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That such strong differences were found between colony types with a modest sample size (a necessary trade of colony number for detailed behavioural observations) is compelling evidence that these differences are real. Furthermore, it reinforces the trend that single-patriline honey bee colonies consistently underperform relative to multiple-patriline colonies (Fuchs and Schade, 1994;Jones et al, 2004;Seeley, 2007, 2010;Mattila et al, 2008;Oldroyd et al, 1992), rather than showing similar mean performance with a relative increase in variation around that mean.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That such strong differences were found between colony types with a modest sample size (a necessary trade of colony number for detailed behavioural observations) is compelling evidence that these differences are real. Furthermore, it reinforces the trend that single-patriline honey bee colonies consistently underperform relative to multiple-patriline colonies (Fuchs and Schade, 1994;Jones et al, 2004;Seeley, 2007, 2010;Mattila et al, 2008;Oldroyd et al, 1992), rather than showing similar mean performance with a relative increase in variation around that mean.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Honey bee queens who mate multiply minimize the fitness load incurred by colonies as a result of the production of sterile diploid males (Page, 1980;Shaskolsky, 1976;Tarpy and Page, 2002) and produce work forces with an enhanced ability to overcome the effects of parasites and pathogens (Baer and Schmid-Hempel, 2001;Palmer and Oldroyd, 2003;Seeley and Tarpy, 2007;Sherman et al, 1988;Tarpy and Seeley, 2006). Importantly, intracolonial genetic diversity has been linked to an increase in colony-level productivity and long-term fitness (Fuchs and Schade, 1994;Jones et al, 2004;Oldroyd et al, 1992;Mattila and Seeley, 2007). Similar increases in colony growth and foraging productivity have been found in harvester ants (Cole and Wiernasz, 1999;Wiernasz et al, 2004Wiernasz et al, , 2008 and wasps (Goodisman et al, 2007) as mate number per queen rises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the honeybee, it has been shown that short-term productivity of small colonies tends to be higher in genetically more diverse colonies (Fuchs & Schade 1994). However, this trend does not occur in larger nests and/or over longer time periods, and it depends on genotypes (Oldroyd et al 1992;Fuchs & Schade 1994). Genetic diversity was also shown to reduce colony-level variance in task performance or at maintaining a stable temperature in the nest (Jones et al 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One proposal for the evolution of polyandry in social Hymenoptera is that increased genetic diversity among worker offspring translates into a more efficient division of labour (polyethism), so raising the efficiency of the colony and its overall productivity (Crozier & Page 1985;Mattila & Seeley 2007;Oldroyd & Fewell 2007). By mating multiply, queens produce genetically diverse workers that carry different genes from their respective fathers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a number of studies, while not directly investigating the relationship between genetic diversity and disease, have investigated whether it improves colony fitness. Although some have found colony fitness benefits to result from polyandry (Oldroyd et al 1992;Fuchs and Schade 1994;Page et al 1995;Cole and Wiernaz 1999), others have not (Fuchs et al 1996;Sundström and Ratnieks 1998;Neumann and Moritz 2000;Costa and Ross 2003;Fjerdingstad et al 2003). The evidence for the genetic diversity/disease resistance hypothesis is thus currently limited to just two species {Apis mellifera and Bombus terrestris), of which one {Bombus terrestris) is obligately monoandrous (Schmid-Hempel and Schmid-Hempel 2000; .…”
Section: Acromyrmex and Pogonomyrmex])mentioning
confidence: 99%