2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2019.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intratesticular vs intraepididymal calcium chloride sterilant on testicular morphology and fertility in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A single intratesticular injection that could cause the interruption of spermatogenesis would be particularly interesting for its simplicity and speed, as it could be applied to many animals in a single day without the need for specific equipment or environment. In general, zinc gluconate and calcium chloride, the most used substances for chemical castration by intratesticular injection, cause atrophy in the seminiferous tubules, disruption in spermatogenesis, fibrosis and calcification of testicular parenchyma and reduction of testicular volume, together with reduced sperm motility and low sperm count or azoospermia, leading to subfertility or infertility in male animals (Fagundes et al 2014;Vannucchi et al 2015;Silva et al 2018;Leoci et al 2019;Rafatmah, Mogheiseh, and Eshghi 2019). However, many studies report side effects in the treated animals, such as swelling, inflammation, pain, hemorrhage, necrosis and scrotal ulcerations (Levy et al 2008;Oliveira et al 2013;Forz an et al 2014;Rafatmah, Mogheiseh, and Eshghi 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A single intratesticular injection that could cause the interruption of spermatogenesis would be particularly interesting for its simplicity and speed, as it could be applied to many animals in a single day without the need for specific equipment or environment. In general, zinc gluconate and calcium chloride, the most used substances for chemical castration by intratesticular injection, cause atrophy in the seminiferous tubules, disruption in spermatogenesis, fibrosis and calcification of testicular parenchyma and reduction of testicular volume, together with reduced sperm motility and low sperm count or azoospermia, leading to subfertility or infertility in male animals (Fagundes et al 2014;Vannucchi et al 2015;Silva et al 2018;Leoci et al 2019;Rafatmah, Mogheiseh, and Eshghi 2019). However, many studies report side effects in the treated animals, such as swelling, inflammation, pain, hemorrhage, necrosis and scrotal ulcerations (Levy et al 2008;Oliveira et al 2013;Forz an et al 2014;Rafatmah, Mogheiseh, and Eshghi 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1960 researchers are looking for simple methods to neuter male animals, requiring for example a single injection of a neutering drug. Many attempts to find effective drugs to produce the so called chemical castration have been carried out using calcium chloride (Jana and Samanta 2006, 2007, 2011Leoci et al 2019), cadmium chloride (Kar 1961), ferric chloride and ferrous sulfate (Kar et al 1965), glycerol (Wiebe et al 1989), lactic acid (Fordyce et al 1989), and zinc gluconate by intratesticular injection. In fact, the intratesticular treatment with an injectable zinc gluconate (neutralized in arginine) has been approved in 2003 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in dogs (ACC&D 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although CaCl 2 castration seems to be an appropriate non-surgical strategy in the terms of efficacy, cost, animal welfare and metabolic issues in albino rats, cats, dogs, and Black Bengal goats [2][3][4][5][6][7], little is known about its impacts on the physiological status of body across a time-window study. In an attempt to explore the dosedependent response of different animal species to intratesticular injection of CaCl 2 , previous studies reported that this method of chemo-castration was not accompanied with long-term stress reactivity [3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of chemical sterilants for neutralization have been used, but few products have been effective, safe or available for regular uses [11]. Researchers have used chemical agents for the castration of male dogs by intratesticular injection such as calcium chloride [3, 4, 8, 12], cadmium chloride [13], ferric chloride and ferrous sulfate [14], danazol [15], Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) [15], glycerol [16], and lactic acid [17]. Among the common chemical sterilants available for chemical sterilization, zinc gluconate (with different brand names like Neutersol®/ Esterisol®) is considered a noncarcinogenic, nonteratogenic, and nonmutagenic material [18] and it can be used as a chemical sterilant agent in puppies [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%