2021
DOI: 10.1029/2020gl091494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ion Slippage in Earth's Ionosphere and the Plasma Sheet

Abstract: Although triggering mechanisms for substorm onsets remain highly controversial, consensus has reached that violation of frozen‐in flux condition in the central plasma sheet is required. In this study, we carry out a numerical gedanken experiment to investigate the effects of the violation by assuming ions slip with respect to the magnetic field lines in the late substorm growth phase while electrons remain magnetized, without specifying the microphysics. The simulation results predict (1) a thin arc and a stro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(73 reference statements)
1
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It also has the advantage to investigate the transient fast flow with designated injection interval by changing the boundary conditions, which remains a challenge for standalone MHD codes. Similar to our previous work (e.g., Wang et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2011), we set up the initial and boundary conditions using the empirical magnetic field (Tsyganenko, 1989) and plasma (Tsyganenko & Mukai, 2003) models driven by typical solar wind and geomagnetic conditions, that is, IMF B Z = –3.0 nT, solar wind number density N = 5.0 cm −3 , velocity V = 400 km/s, Kp = 1.0, cross‐polar‐cap potential drops = 50 kV. As most bursty bulk flows (BBFs) are found between the mid‐tail region and the near‐Earth region (−30 < X < −10 Re) and with the velocity greater than 300 km/s (e.g., Angelopoulos et al., 1994; Ohtani et al., 2004), we inject the bubble from the tail at −30 Re following 30 min of adiabatic convection.…”
Section: Simulationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It also has the advantage to investigate the transient fast flow with designated injection interval by changing the boundary conditions, which remains a challenge for standalone MHD codes. Similar to our previous work (e.g., Wang et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2011), we set up the initial and boundary conditions using the empirical magnetic field (Tsyganenko, 1989) and plasma (Tsyganenko & Mukai, 2003) models driven by typical solar wind and geomagnetic conditions, that is, IMF B Z = –3.0 nT, solar wind number density N = 5.0 cm −3 , velocity V = 400 km/s, Kp = 1.0, cross‐polar‐cap potential drops = 50 kV. As most bursty bulk flows (BBFs) are found between the mid‐tail region and the near‐Earth region (−30 < X < −10 Re) and with the velocity greater than 300 km/s (e.g., Angelopoulos et al., 1994; Ohtani et al., 2004), we inject the bubble from the tail at −30 Re following 30 min of adiabatic convection.…”
Section: Simulationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…It is also notable that although the stretching behind the bubble has been formulated earlier by the ion slippage scenario (Wang et al, 2021), it differs from this study in many aspects. The frozen-in flux condition is violated in the ion slippage for the generation of the bubble-blob pair, resulting in a Hall electric current in the plasma sheet closing the downward FAC associated with the blob and the upward FAC associated with the bubble.…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkscontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation