2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102895
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ionic liquids and dual curing on vat photopolymerization process and properties of 3d-printed ionogels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting actuator achieved great peak-to-peak deformation, shown in Figure b and Video S1. The generated average strain of 10 deformation cycles was 0.68 ± 0.02%, which is on par with similar actuators composed of petroleum-based electrodes …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The resulting actuator achieved great peak-to-peak deformation, shown in Figure b and Video S1. The generated average strain of 10 deformation cycles was 0.68 ± 0.02%, which is on par with similar actuators composed of petroleum-based electrodes …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 55%
“…To demonstrate the applicability in advanced use cases, developed biobased electrodes were used to fabricate fully 3D printed soft-robotic actuators in combination with previously reported ionogel membranes. 50 The 3D printed soft robotic actuator (40 × 5 mm) comprised a 200 μm-thick single-layer ionogel membrane that was compressed between two 60 μm-thick single-layer biobased electrodes. SEM images in Figure 6a evaluate the connection quality between biobased electrodes and ionogel membranes.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hightemperature tolerance of SFIG3 is a result of the fluorinated P(AA-co-HFBA) backbone and the excellent thermal stability of [BMIM][BF 4 ]. 40 The glass transition temperatures (T g ) of the SFIGs were evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in Figure 4g to evaluate the antifreeze performance of the SFIGs. There was only one T g per SFIG sample, indicating that there was no phase separation occurring within the SFIG.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the G ′ and G ″ values declined as the temperature rose, indicating that the network structure was less physically cross-linked at a higher temperature. The high-temperature tolerance of SFIG3 is a result of the fluorinated P­(AA- co -HFBA) backbone and the excellent thermal stability of [BMIM]­[BF 4 ] . The glass transition temperatures ( T g ) of the SFIGs were evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) in Figure g to evaluate the antifreeze performance of the SFIGs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%