1961
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(61)90577-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ischemia and hypoxia on the specialized conducting system of the canine heart

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

1962
1962
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following findings suggest that LSVF is maintained by activation spreading from the PF network to the WM: 1) the endocardium, the location of the PF-WM junctions, had the highest activation rate in our canine study, as opposed to previously reported findings that the activation rate during VF is high transmurally in porcine hearts (1,15), in which the PF-WM junctions are distributed intramurally almost to the epicardium (10, 11); 2) PF activation was coupled to and preceded WM activation during LSVF; 3) the activation sequences from the endocardium to the epicardium and the PF activation properties in LSVF were similar to sinus rhythm; and 4) the canine PF network is more resistant to the global ischemia caused by VF than is WM (2,8,9,13), so that during long-duration VF, it was possible for activation to initiate in the PF network and propagate through the PF-WM junctions and then spread in the WM. During LSVF, the WM activations have multiple initiation sites on the endocardium (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following findings suggest that LSVF is maintained by activation spreading from the PF network to the WM: 1) the endocardium, the location of the PF-WM junctions, had the highest activation rate in our canine study, as opposed to previously reported findings that the activation rate during VF is high transmurally in porcine hearts (1,15), in which the PF-WM junctions are distributed intramurally almost to the epicardium (10, 11); 2) PF activation was coupled to and preceded WM activation during LSVF; 3) the activation sequences from the endocardium to the epicardium and the PF activation properties in LSVF were similar to sinus rhythm; and 4) the canine PF network is more resistant to the global ischemia caused by VF than is WM (2,8,9,13), so that during long-duration VF, it was possible for activation to initiate in the PF network and propagate through the PF-WM junctions and then spread in the WM. During LSVF, the WM activations have multiple initiation sites on the endocardium (Figs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The leading explanations for this observation are that PFs are more resistant than the myocardium to the effects of ischemia, as shown in several studies, and that the PFs are less ischemic because they receive oxygen by diffusion from the immobile blood in the ventricular cavities during VF. [11][12][13] Newton et al 32 used plunge needles in the left ventricular free wall of canines to show that after 2 minutes of VF, the endocardium is activating more rapidly, with conduction block occurring more commonly at the epicardium. On the basis of figures presented in that report, no apparent conducting wave fronts propagate from intramural regions toward the endocardium, consistent with activations arising from the PF system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Even after extensive infarction of myocardial tissue, subendocardial PFs in canine models remain structurally and electrophysiologically intact and capable of rapid activation. [11][12][13] Using 3-dimensional modeling, Berenfeld and Jalife 14 have shown that focal activity may arise at the Purkinje muscle junctions, leading to initiation of VF. This model predicted that the PFs become irrelevant after intramyocardial reentry is established during the early stages of VF.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthernore, ischemia and asphyxia also impair A-V node transmission (8)(9)(10) and enhance the atrial and ventricular cardiac cell production of adenosine (11,12). In addition, in isolated perfused guinea pig hearts, aminophylline, a competitive antagonist ofadenosine, significantly attenuates and reverses the A-V conduction delay and block caused by adenosine and/or hypoxia (3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%