1990
DOI: 10.1254/jjp.54.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of KT-362, a New Calcium Release Blocker, on Vascular Selectivity and Hemodynamic Actions in Anesthetized Dogs

Abstract: Abstract-Pharmacologicalproperties of 5-(3-((2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)ethyl)-amino) -1 -oxopropyl)-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1,5-benzothiazepine fumarate (KT-362), a newly synthesized calcium release blocker, were studied by comparing its vascular selectivity and cardiovascular actions with those of verapamil, a calcium entry blocker. The relaxing effect of KT-362 in rabbit femoral and basilar artery strips contracted with norepinephrine was greater than that in aortic and coronary artery strips. In anesthetized mongre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…EC 50 values for negative inotropy, chronotropy and dromotropy were about 25, 3 and 3 times lower for verapamil compared to those with KT-362 [42]. Verapamil was again more potent than KT-362 in anesthetized dogs as prolongation of PQ interval on the electrocardiogram was observed with 0.1 mg/kg verapamil but KT-362 even at 10 mg/kg evoked no negative dromotropic action [332] [333]. In anesthetized ischemic dogs KT-362 (0.3 mg/kg/min intravenously started 10-15 min before and continued throughout the occlusion) but not diltiazem (15 and 30 µg/kg/min) produced a significant decrease in HR and dP/dt max [333].…”
Section: Kt-362mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…EC 50 values for negative inotropy, chronotropy and dromotropy were about 25, 3 and 3 times lower for verapamil compared to those with KT-362 [42]. Verapamil was again more potent than KT-362 in anesthetized dogs as prolongation of PQ interval on the electrocardiogram was observed with 0.1 mg/kg verapamil but KT-362 even at 10 mg/kg evoked no negative dromotropic action [332] [333]. In anesthetized ischemic dogs KT-362 (0.3 mg/kg/min intravenously started 10-15 min before and continued throughout the occlusion) but not diltiazem (15 and 30 µg/kg/min) produced a significant decrease in HR and dP/dt max [333].…”
Section: Kt-362mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Indeed, KT-362 at concentrations ranging from 3 to 300 p M did not change the APD in guinea pig ventricular papillary muscles (2,14). Furthermore, in electrocardiograms (ECGs) recorded from anesthetized dogs, KT-362 administered intravenously at a dose of 10 mg/kg significantly lengthened the QT interval (26). at 10 pM did not depress the transient depolarization (Fig.…”
Section: The Effect Of Kt-362 On Other Currentsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…drug administration to conscious dogs, although there were no changes in the QRS or QT interval [30]. Similarly, intravenous verapamil administration at 0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg induced significant prolongation (8.9% and 20.0%, respectively) of the PQ interval in anesthetized dogs, whereas no changes were seen in the QRS or QT interval [31]. In addition, dose-dependent decreases in heart rate and LVdP/dt max were observed with verapamil (−12.3% and −23.1%, respectively, at 0.3 mg/kg) [31].…”
Section: Open Access Ppmentioning
confidence: 99%