2020
DOI: 10.1007/s13197-020-04842-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of lactic, malic and fumaric acids on Salmonella spp. counts and on chicken meat quality and sensory characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, crosscontamination can occur during the evisceration stage due to leakage of intestinal contents (Berrang et al, 2011). Fernandez et al (2021) found that count of Salmonellae in fumaric acid treated samples were significantly differ than control samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, crosscontamination can occur during the evisceration stage due to leakage of intestinal contents (Berrang et al, 2011). Fernandez et al (2021) found that count of Salmonellae in fumaric acid treated samples were significantly differ than control samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Salmonella Typhimurium counts were performed on XLD, as selective media. The values of log reduction were estimated by subtracting counts of samples treated with the different organic acids from counts of control samples, according to (Fernández et al, 2020).…”
Section: Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernández et al [74] dipped Salmonella-contaminated chicken breast in 3% solutions lactic, malic and fumaric acid. It was found that fumaric acid had the highest efficacy (up to 2.22 log CFU/g reduction) but affected the sensory properties of the chicken breast the most.…”
Section: Organic Acidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first results in the formation of the L-seryladenylate intermediate releasing inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi) in the presence of ATP and Mg 2+ . The L-seryl group is then transferred to tRNA Ser , or tRNA [Ser]Sec , at the 3 -OH end, resulting in L-seryl-tRNA Ser or L-seryl-tRNA [Ser]Sec [48]. Mocibob et al [49] found that the proximal region of seryl-tRNA synthetase C-terminal extension region can keep the protein which is generally stable.…”
Section: Protein Translationmentioning
confidence: 99%