2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of land use and transportation on carbon sources and carbon sinks: A case study in Shenzhen, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been some research into factors influencing land use carbon sink effects within highly urbanized areas. The effect of carbon sinks in urban ecosystems has been examined from the perspectives of climate factor 3 and climate change 4 , different land use types 512 and land use change 13 , land use management 14 , transportation activities 15 , locational conditions 16 , the level of urbanization 1 , and so on. The urbanization process extensively influences the quantity, types, and spatial distribution patterns of land use, with the carbon sink function of different land uses changing accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been some research into factors influencing land use carbon sink effects within highly urbanized areas. The effect of carbon sinks in urban ecosystems has been examined from the perspectives of climate factor 3 and climate change 4 , different land use types 512 and land use change 13 , land use management 14 , transportation activities 15 , locational conditions 16 , the level of urbanization 1 , and so on. The urbanization process extensively influences the quantity, types, and spatial distribution patterns of land use, with the carbon sink function of different land uses changing accordingly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local residents intermingle with newcomers creating a varied society. Zhang et al (2014), CO 2 emitted during industrial fossil-fuel consumption and by the transportation sector has been gradually increasing in Shenzhen. -SQ has different kind of connections with other cities of the PRD, the global economy through Hong Kong, and mainland China (Fig.…”
Section: Sungang-quingshuihe Neighbourhood As the New Innovative Growmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSW = W_solid × RDOC × fDOC, where R_carbon represents the average carbon emission per person per day (kg/(person·day)), a parameter estimated by sampling a large number of Chinese people; p represents the population of a particular area; E_industrial represents the annual industrial fossil coal consumption, which can be acquired directly from the Beijing Statistical Yearbook [90]; fcoal represents the carbon emission factor (t·C/t), which proved to be accessible and representative of the Chinese coal-based carbon emission factor [81]; Car_number represents the actual number of vehicles in a particular area; distance represents the driving distance of each vehicle per day (km/day), which is assumed to be 40 (the average commute time across all modes is expected to be pertinent because an increase in this variable is likely to lead to an increase in CO2 emissions (longer trips) in an urbanized area [95]; g represents the estimated amount of fuel combusted for each trip, in which the gasoline is combusted in a medium-freight vehicle (0.265 L/km) [93]; fgasoline represents the conversion factor for gasoline to g C (65.8 g·C/L), which is the parameter from the research on carbon emissions modeling at an urban neighborhood scale [93]; E_domestic represents the domestic electricity use; felectricity represents the conversion factor for electricity to standard coal, which is widely used in China; and W_solid represents the municipal solid waste production, which can also be acquired directly from the Beijing Statistical Yearbook [90]. RDOC is the ratio of biodegradable organic carbon to solid waste (the IPCC-recommended value for an East Asian country is 14% [94]); and fDOC is the actual decomposition ratio of the DOC (50% is the IPCC-recommended value [94]).…”
Section: Urban Carbon Emission Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To explain the spatial differences in the carbon sequestration and oxygen emission capacity, the spatial distribution of the carbon sequestration and oxygen emissions per unit area are displayed in Figures 4 and 5, respectively. The carbon density is influenced by the prevailing climate, temperature, illumination time, dominant vegetation, regional development, urbanization level, population density, and land use intensity [2,4,18,19,81,88]. Even a particular type of vegetation at one location may have variable biomass due to the environmental heterogeneity.…”
Section: Spatial Pattern Of Carbon Sequestration and Oxygen Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation