2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52959-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of land use change from natural forest to plantation on C, N and natural abundance of 13C and 15N along a climate gradient in eastern China

Abstract: Soil C and N turnover rates and contents are strongly influenced by climates (e.g., mean annual temperature MAT, and mean annual precipitation MAP) as well as human activities. However, the effects of converting natural forests to intensively human-managed plantations on soil carbon (C), nitrogen (N) dynamics across various climatic zones are not well known. In this study, we evaluated C, N pool and natural abundances of δ13C and δ15N in forest floor layer and 1-meter depth mineral soils under natural forests … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increases in SOC stock with increasing plantation age have been reported by various authors (e.g., Guo & Gifford, 2002; Lugo & Brown, 1993; Paul et al, 2002). This is in line with the results reported by Ngaba et al (2019). Soil disturbance from site preparation for agricultural use and for the establishment of second rotation is also responsible for decreased SOC in younger and second‐rotation plantations, since site preparation increases the decomposition of soil‐C (Guo & Gifford, 2002), impacting negatively SOC stocks, during the first decades (Mayer et al, 2020), depending on site preparation practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Increases in SOC stock with increasing plantation age have been reported by various authors (e.g., Guo & Gifford, 2002; Lugo & Brown, 1993; Paul et al, 2002). This is in line with the results reported by Ngaba et al (2019). Soil disturbance from site preparation for agricultural use and for the establishment of second rotation is also responsible for decreased SOC in younger and second‐rotation plantations, since site preparation increases the decomposition of soil‐C (Guo & Gifford, 2002), impacting negatively SOC stocks, during the first decades (Mayer et al, 2020), depending on site preparation practice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…where TX is soil C or N stock (kg C m −2 ); X% i is C or N in percentage at depth i; BD i is bulk density at depth i; and v i is volume of soil at each horizon; a is the instrument's typical precision ±0.005% for C and ±0.001% for N according to the manufacturer's standard material (Assefa et al, 2017). The carbon and nitrogen content data were obtained from our previous manuscript (Ngaba et al, 2019) (Table 3). Two-way ANOVA method was used to test the significance of differences in site, depth and their interactions on soil C and N stocks under NF and PF using a significance level of a = 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the labile N in soil is the product of microbial activity and is easily absorbed by plants or lost into the adjacent water. Additionally, high temperature accelerates the mineralization of soil N by enhancing microbial activity (Y. Q. Li et al, 2018; Ngaba et al, 2019; Suseela, Tharayil, Xing, & Dukes, 2015) and stimulates the uptake of inorganic N by plants. Nevertheless, cHCl‐ and RES‐N were primarily limited by moisture conditions, and precipitation promoted their accumulation (Figure 3f2, g2, f3 and g3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current study, increasing MAT directly decreased the soil labile N contents. This may be related to the acceleration of organic N mineralization and plant uptake of available N (Ngaba et al, 2019; Suseela et al, 2015), as discussed in Section 4.3. A portion of the indirect influences of MAT on 6 M HCl‐ and stable N were exerted via its effects on vegetation; however, the indirect effects ( β = 0.06 and 0.08) countered the direct effects ( α = −0.57 and −0.23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%