2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1001-0742(09)60199-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of land use change and water reuse options on urban water cycle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploring the urban hydrosocial cycle in tourist environments services to growing populations) for identifying problems associated with urbanization (Lee et al, 2010) and for coping with urban water challenges as well as global environmental change (Fletcher, 2013). This concept has put together the interdependence of urban water resources and human activities, and the need for integrated management.…”
Section: The Hydrological Cycle In Urban Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Exploring the urban hydrosocial cycle in tourist environments services to growing populations) for identifying problems associated with urbanization (Lee et al, 2010) and for coping with urban water challenges as well as global environmental change (Fletcher, 2013). This concept has put together the interdependence of urban water resources and human activities, and the need for integrated management.…”
Section: The Hydrological Cycle In Urban Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the models have been developed and applied to demonstrate their functionality in estimating and/or forecasting the water demand in urban areas worldwide. Such models and cities include the Aquacycle model in Canber-Exploring the urban hydrosocial cycle in tourist environments ra, Australia (Mitchell et al, 2001) and in Seoul (Lee et al, 2010), the City Water Balance (CWB) model (Last and Mackay, 2010), the Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology in Alexandria, Egypt (Mahgoub, 2010), as well as the Urban Water Optioneering Tool (UWOT) (Makropoulos et al, 2008). The Alexandria' s study, for example, focused on the assessment of the urban water system and provided scenarios encompassing technical interventions, better management procedures, and generally, new solutions for improving the systems in the future.…”
Section: The Integrated Urban Water Cyclementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resulting from increases in impervious surface area, urban growth results in increased stormwater runoff volumes. Following the approach of Franczyk & Chang (2009) and Lee et al (2010) we will use mean runoff depth as an indicator for changes in runoff patterns due to surface cover changes. Mean runoff depth is the water depth covering the study area if all of the mean runoff over a time period was distributed evenly over the area.…”
Section: Runoff Response To Land-cover Change Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study conducted in Seoul, South Korea, evaluated how an urban water cycle is affected by land use change and implementation of water reuse strategies (Lee et al, 2010). For the given watershed, it was determined that reuse of wastewater would result in water supply savings of 31%, a reduction in wastewater of 30%, and would provide a more consistent water supply throughout the year.…”
Section: Water Quality Planning and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%