2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of land uses and rainfall regimes on surface runoff and sediment yield in a nested watershed of the Loess Plateau, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming negligible surface runoff for the R. pseudoacacia and P. tabuliformis plantations (Zhao et al, 2022), the water consumption of R. pseudoacacia and P. tabuliformis plantation was calculated by the water balance equation, without considering the similar canopy interception (Jian et al, 2015), as shown below: SWSIgoodbreak=10×SWCi×di×hiρ$$ {SWS}_I=\sum \frac{10\times {SWC}_i\times {d}_i\times {h}_i}{\rho } $$ italicETgoodbreak=Pgoodbreak−italicSWS$$ ET=P-\Delta SWS $$ where SWSI$$ {SWS}_I $$ is the layer‐cumulated soil water storage of the I th aggregated soil layer (i.e., 0–20, 20–40, 40–100, 100–200 cm) at a certain time (mm); SWCi$$ {SWC}_i $$ represents the gravimetric soil moisture (%) of the i th soil layer in soil sampling; di$$ {d}_i $$ indicates the soil bulk density of the i th soil layer (g/cm 3 ); hi$$ {h}_i $$ represents the thickness of the i th soil layer; ρ$$ \rho $$ is the density of water (1 g/cm 3 ); i indicates the number of soil layers in the I th aggregated soil layer. italicET$$ ET $$ is the water consumption per plantations (mm); P$$ P $$ is the precipitation (mm), which assumed that there was no difference between the two plantations (Jian et al, 2015); italicSWS$$ \Delta SWS $$ is the dynamic of the …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming negligible surface runoff for the R. pseudoacacia and P. tabuliformis plantations (Zhao et al, 2022), the water consumption of R. pseudoacacia and P. tabuliformis plantation was calculated by the water balance equation, without considering the similar canopy interception (Jian et al, 2015), as shown below: SWSIgoodbreak=10×SWCi×di×hiρ$$ {SWS}_I=\sum \frac{10\times {SWC}_i\times {d}_i\times {h}_i}{\rho } $$ italicETgoodbreak=Pgoodbreak−italicSWS$$ ET=P-\Delta SWS $$ where SWSI$$ {SWS}_I $$ is the layer‐cumulated soil water storage of the I th aggregated soil layer (i.e., 0–20, 20–40, 40–100, 100–200 cm) at a certain time (mm); SWCi$$ {SWC}_i $$ represents the gravimetric soil moisture (%) of the i th soil layer in soil sampling; di$$ {d}_i $$ indicates the soil bulk density of the i th soil layer (g/cm 3 ); hi$$ {h}_i $$ represents the thickness of the i th soil layer; ρ$$ \rho $$ is the density of water (1 g/cm 3 ); i indicates the number of soil layers in the I th aggregated soil layer. italicET$$ ET $$ is the water consumption per plantations (mm); P$$ P $$ is the precipitation (mm), which assumed that there was no difference between the two plantations (Jian et al, 2015); italicSWS$$ \Delta SWS $$ is the dynamic of the …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming negligible surface runoff for the R. pseudoacacia and P. tabuliformis plantations (Zhao et al, 2022), the water consumption of R. pseudoacacia and P. tabuliformis plantation was calculated by the water balance equation, without considering the similar canopy interception (Jian et al, 2015), as shown below:…”
Section: Plant Water Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study region is located in the Caijiachuan watershed in the Ji County, Shanxi Province, which is the Loess Plateau of China (Figure 1, 36 14 0 -36 18 0 N, 110 39 0 -110 47 0 E) and has an altitude of 897 $ 1557 m. The study area is characterized by a continental monsoon climate, and is cold in winter and warm in summer, with a mean annual temperature of 10.2 C and mean annual precipitation of 575.9 mm, with the precipitation from June to September accounting for about 70% annually (Zhao et al, 2022). The soil type is primarily a Haplic Luvisol (IUSS-WRB, 2015) and mostly alkaline (Wang et al, 2022).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For agricultural areas, they have barely 1% (1.5 km 2 ) of the catchment area. According to Zhao et al (2004), a good relationship between vegetation cover and runoff, where a high runoff was traced to deforestation and urbanization. The study featured a similar trend, which established a strong link between rainfall and runoff due to low vegetation cover.…”
Section: Land Use/land Covermentioning
confidence: 99%