Shock Waves and High-Strain-Rate Phenomena in Metals 1981
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3219-0_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Laser Induced Shock Waves on Metals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
97
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Impact toughness, a k1 , and the gradient, k, for different laser power densities and different numbers of laser shots: a different laser power densities and b different numbers of laser shots LSP. In Table 2, the surface hardness increases from 236.8 to 246.1 kg · mm −2 as the laser power density increases from 2.6 to 4.4 GW · cm −2 , which has the identical trend with the experimental results of Clauer and Fairand [27]. Clauer and Fairand [27] found that the average surface hardness of 2024-T351 increases with peak shock pressure while the peak pressure is proportional to the square root of laser power density.…”
Section: Impact Toughnesssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 Impact toughness, a k1 , and the gradient, k, for different laser power densities and different numbers of laser shots: a different laser power densities and b different numbers of laser shots LSP. In Table 2, the surface hardness increases from 236.8 to 246.1 kg · mm −2 as the laser power density increases from 2.6 to 4.4 GW · cm −2 , which has the identical trend with the experimental results of Clauer and Fairand [27]. Clauer and Fairand [27] found that the average surface hardness of 2024-T351 increases with peak shock pressure while the peak pressure is proportional to the square root of laser power density.…”
Section: Impact Toughnesssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…In Table 2, the surface hardness increases from 236.8 to 246.1 kg · mm −2 as the laser power density increases from 2.6 to 4.4 GW · cm −2 , which has the identical trend with the experimental results of Clauer and Fairand [27]. Clauer and Fairand [27] found that the average surface hardness of 2024-T351 increases with peak shock pressure while the peak pressure is proportional to the square root of laser power density. The increase in the gradient can be ascribed to the fact that the increasing rate of impact toughness is higher than the increasing rate of the depth of the GHL according to Eq.…”
Section: Impact Toughnesssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…It has been shown that the residual stresses can be directly related to the fatigue life of samples [25,[27][28][29][31][32][33]37,38] with a clear beneficial effect of compressive stresses in the near surface region. It was also observed that the depth of the compressive residual stresses has a direct influence on the fatigue life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the dominant commercial market for laser glass is in large laser systems for inertial confinement fusion research with application to fusion energy and weapons physics science [56], these materials have also found their way into a number of industrial and laboratory environments. For example, one leading application is in the field of laser shock peening [57]. Structural characteristics of thin films are technologically very important.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%