2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of laser polar-body biopsy on embryo quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hammoud and co-workers further investigated the effect of using lasers for polar body biopsies and concluded that there were no deleterious effects of laser drilling for polar body biopsy in in-vitro matured oocytes in terms of oocyte lysis, oocyte activation or chromosome breakage in embryos (Hammoud et al, 2010). In another study, laser-treated groups showed significantly higher chemical pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates compared with controls (Levin et al, 2012). FIGURE 2 shows a typical polar body biopsy.…”
Section: Laser-assisted Polar Body Biopsymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Hammoud and co-workers further investigated the effect of using lasers for polar body biopsies and concluded that there were no deleterious effects of laser drilling for polar body biopsy in in-vitro matured oocytes in terms of oocyte lysis, oocyte activation or chromosome breakage in embryos (Hammoud et al, 2010). In another study, laser-treated groups showed significantly higher chemical pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates compared with controls (Levin et al, 2012). FIGURE 2 shows a typical polar body biopsy.…”
Section: Laser-assisted Polar Body Biopsymentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This turns to be disadvantaging compared to the diagnosis of blastomeres or trophectoderm biopsy where the embryo genetic status is directly diagnosed instead of being deduced. Yet, ADO events can jeopardize the results and frequently an additional biopsy of the embryos is required, which turns the PB diagnosis into highly complex and exhausting for IVF and PGD labs [28]. After practicing this approach for several years at our unit, it has been decided not to opt for it unless it is inevitable (for example with de novo maternal mutations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a basic science viewpoint, there are several issues to be resolved. First, whether biopsy of the polar body, early blastomeres or trophectoderm may in itself have negative short-term or long-term effects on the offspring as well as being inaccurate [29,30] Second, what is the impact of mitotic errors and instability on early human development [31] and lastly whether, as suggested for large animal embryos, abnormal cells may be tolerated by the human embryo, sequestered into the trophectoderm or indeed eliminated by cell death mechanisms [32]. Finally, we would like to point out that, in any case, perfect euploidy is not a guarantee for development and that embryos may also block in development due to non-genomic effects and probably single gene defects.…”
Section: Clinical Concernsmentioning
confidence: 99%