The ability of the Satz and Mogel (1962) short form WAIS-R to provide equivalent information about IQ scores and age-corrected scale scores was examined as a function of side of lesion for 34 left hemisphere damaged (LHD) and 29 right hemisphere damaged (RHD) patients having primary brain tumors. Correlations between the two forms were significant for all WAIS-R scores with the exception of the Object Assembly subtest for RHD patients. The short form significantly overestimated Verbal IQ, Performance IQ, Full Scale IQ, Similarities and Picture Arrangement subtest scores. It significantly underestimated Object Assembly subtest scores. A marked percentage of patients showed one or more category changes for most WAIS-R scores and two or more category changes for some of these scores. The distribution of discrepancies between scores and the number of category changes did not differ significantly for LHD and RHD patients.Short forms of the Wechsler Intelligence Scales have been developed by eliminating entire subtexts (Sirverstein, 1982) or by eliminating items within subtests (Pauker, 1963;Satz & Mogel, 1962;Vincent, 1979). Both types of changes are problematic in several ways. Although the following discussion will focus on problems associated with the Satz-Mogel short form (Satz & Mogel, 1962), the issues raised apply to other short forms as well.Although correlation coefficients relating the Satz-Mogel short form to full length Wechsler test IQ and subtest scaled scores tend to be relatively high (