2021
DOI: 10.1002/ldr.4079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of livestock grazing on soil health and recovery of a degraded Andean Araucaria forest

Abstract: Araucaria araucana is an iconic long-lived endangered tree species native to Southern Chile and Argentina. Araucaria forests and soils provide a myriad of ecosystem benefits to local communities, which are threatened by increasing anthropic-driven disturbances like fire and livestock overgrazing. The main objectives of this study were: (i) to evaluate the effect of uncontrolled livestock grazing on soil health; and (ii) to identify a set of sensitive soil health indicators to grazing pressure. Twenty soil heal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher number of species, density, and basal area in UF (Table 1) are due to direct consequence of protection that lead to presence of higher number of species and population due to favourable site conditions and lesser mortality and stressed condition as compare to the DF (Mota et al, 2017). This reflects good regenerative potential of the species and stable growing environment and pattern in UF than the DF (Crovo et al, 2021). Further, the greater ecological amplitude and good capacity of regeneration of species in the UF lead to overall plant health in terms of their quantitative phytosociological characteristic as compared to the DF.…”
Section: Phytosociological Attributesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The higher number of species, density, and basal area in UF (Table 1) are due to direct consequence of protection that lead to presence of higher number of species and population due to favourable site conditions and lesser mortality and stressed condition as compare to the DF (Mota et al, 2017). This reflects good regenerative potential of the species and stable growing environment and pattern in UF than the DF (Crovo et al, 2021). Further, the greater ecological amplitude and good capacity of regeneration of species in the UF lead to overall plant health in terms of their quantitative phytosociological characteristic as compared to the DF.…”
Section: Phytosociological Attributesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, inconsistencies of soil nutrients in these soil types might be caused by uncontrolled or heavy grazing practiced in these farms. Large quantities of mineralization increased nutrient uptake by stressed plants ( Crovo et al., 2021 ; Abdalla et al, 2018 ), and this can play part in lowering the available macro nutrients in the soil. Moreover, Ragimov et al (2020) also alluded that high grazing intensity does decline in the net productivity of the rangeland, resulting in the defeat of palatable species and soil chemical properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the higher litter quality (higher N content) in the degraded forest, it tended to accumulate more N than in the secondary forest. This N enrichment could result from external inputs from grazing livestock in the degraded forest area (69).…”
Section: Litter Decomposition and Nutrient Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C:P and N:P values indicated a period of initial immobilization and high mineralization towards the end of this study. This initial accumulation may be due to external sources, for example, the precipitation and fall of new litter from the canopy (70) and also livestock grazing (69). The content of P decreased drastically starting in spring, which suggests more substantial mineralization of this element and reabsorption after the rainy season.…”
Section: Litter Decomposition and Nutrient Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%