2008
DOI: 10.1080/00288230809510445
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of liveweight gain during pregnancy of 15‐month‐old Angus heifers on dystocia and birth weight, body dimensions, estimated milk intake and weaning weight of the calves

Abstract: First-calving, 2-year-old heifers are particularly susceptible to dystocia caused by foetomaternal disproportion. Forty-four 15-month-old Angus heifers were allocated to either a moderate (583 ± 73 g/day) or low (193 ± 71 g/day) liveweight gain treatment for the first trimester (93 days) of pregnancy. Both groups were of similar liveweight at parturition. Birth weight of the calves and incidence of dystocia were not significantly different between treatment groups at 33.0 ± 0.7 kg, compared with 33.8 ± 0.6 kg … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the nutritional regimens were instigated at exactly the same time points in gestation and were controlled with heifers being fed individually from 60 days before AI and throughout gestation until term. This is similar to previous fetal programming studies reported by (Sullivan et al 2009;Micke et al 2010a) but not others (Cafe et al 2006;Greenwood and Cafe 2007;Hickson et al 2008;Long et al 2009Long et al , 2012. Furthermore, in these latter three studies, realimentation of the restricted heifers was applied so that all calved at similar weight.…”
Section: Nutritional Interventionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Thus, the nutritional regimens were instigated at exactly the same time points in gestation and were controlled with heifers being fed individually from 60 days before AI and throughout gestation until term. This is similar to previous fetal programming studies reported by (Sullivan et al 2009;Micke et al 2010a) but not others (Cafe et al 2006;Greenwood and Cafe 2007;Hickson et al 2008;Long et al 2009Long et al , 2012. Furthermore, in these latter three studies, realimentation of the restricted heifers was applied so that all calved at similar weight.…”
Section: Nutritional Interventionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…However, the present study did not show a relationship between the prevalence of dystocia and reproduction outcomes. Interestingly, the prevalence of dystocia was unrelated to BCS, as also shown for pastoral beef cows by Hickson [ 57 ]. The prevalence of abortion was also low (1.5%), well below the 3% industry target [ 49 ] and was unrelated to any other parameters of reproductive performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, the present study did not show a relationship between the prevalence of dystocia and reproduction outcomes. Interestingly, the prevalence of dystocia was unrelated to BCS, as also shown for pastoral beef cows by Hickson [53]. The prevalence of abortion was also low (1.5%), well below the 3% industry target [45] and was unrelated to any other parameters of reproductive performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%