2014
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Load on Wingate Test Performances and Reliability

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of 2 braking forces (8.7 and 11% of body mass, BM) on Wingate test performance, peak lactate ([La]pk), peak heart rate (HRpk), and rate of perceived exertion (RPE). Sixteen male physical education students (age: 22.7 ± 1.3 years, height: 1.81 ± 0.07 m, BM: 74.3 ± 9.6 kg) performed, in a randomized order, 2 Wingate tests at 8.7% BM and 2 Wingate tests at 11% BM on a Monark cycle ergometer on 4 separate sessions. The results showed that the reliability level o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, Mendez-Villanueva and Bishop [19] assessed reliability of the 6 s Wingate performed in a standing position, and Secrest et al [26] recruited a small female sample (n = 5) that would have limited the veracity of the statistical analyses. Other work has reported no significant practice effects for cycle sprints lasting ∼ 5-30 s [9,13,21], indicating that familiarisation is not always required for achievement of stable performance. Performance reliability can be influenced by many factors including training status, time between trials, ergometer quality, and participantspecific characteristics [12], which may help to explain conflicting findings regarding the presence of a practice effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, Mendez-Villanueva and Bishop [19] assessed reliability of the 6 s Wingate performed in a standing position, and Secrest et al [26] recruited a small female sample (n = 5) that would have limited the veracity of the statistical analyses. Other work has reported no significant practice effects for cycle sprints lasting ∼ 5-30 s [9,13,21], indicating that familiarisation is not always required for achievement of stable performance. Performance reliability can be influenced by many factors including training status, time between trials, ergometer quality, and participantspecific characteristics [12], which may help to explain conflicting findings regarding the presence of a practice effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Most studies conducted two trials [4,13,19,21,23], but at least one familiarisation trial is recommended for assessment of cycle sprint performance, as there is often a larger performance change between the first two trials than subsequent pairs of trials [12]. This suggests that two trials may not be sufficient to fully evaluate performance reliability or the magnitude of a practice effect.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean mechanical power achieved during the exercise bouts was lower than that achieved by active individuals performing repeat Wingate tests [ 64 ]. Mean mechanical power declined significantly from the first to the fourth bout in both the HIITPASS and HIITACT conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the study of the changes in power-velocity relationship during an annual training cycle has been proposed in volleyball players [ 21 ], which assumes that the results of the force-velocity tests on cycle ergometers are reliable. The reliability of the cycling all-out tests has mainly been investigated by studying either the test-retest correlation coefficients ( r test-retest ) or the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) or the standard errors of estimations (SEE) or the coefficients of variation (CV) for the indices of maximal power (Wingate peak power or P max⁡ ) with the different protocols [ 1 4 , 6 , 9 , 22 27 ]. In contrast, the reliability of the parameters of the force-velocity relationship (slope, T 0 , F 0 , and V 0 ) has been investigated in a few studies, only [ 4 , 6 , 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%