2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.12.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of local and regional landscape characteristics on wildlife distribution across managed forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute the insignificance of browsing to the availability of more palatable food that is easier to find than our smaller seedlings. Consequently, we do not believe the results of this study should be taken as evidence that deer are an inconsequential factor influencing natural regeneration in northern temperate forests, as our separate observations and the findings of several other investigators support the opposite (Millington et al, 2010;Witt and Webster, 2010;Matonis et al, 2011;Kern et al, 2012).…”
Section: Seedling Survivalcontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We attribute the insignificance of browsing to the availability of more palatable food that is easier to find than our smaller seedlings. Consequently, we do not believe the results of this study should be taken as evidence that deer are an inconsequential factor influencing natural regeneration in northern temperate forests, as our separate observations and the findings of several other investigators support the opposite (Millington et al, 2010;Witt and Webster, 2010;Matonis et al, 2011;Kern et al, 2012).…”
Section: Seedling Survivalcontrasting
confidence: 53%
“…Similarly, certain species of seedlings also show a greater tolerance to browsing compared to others (Augustine and McNaughton, 1998;Côtê et al, 2004). Therefore, even if silvicultural treatments are successful at overcoming establishment substrate and light/non-tree competition barriers to regeneration, outcomes in harvest gaps may still ultimately reflect local deer density (Millington et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This calls for caution in designing strategies with regard to the improvement of game habitat. It may be a good idea to improve game habitat in areas greater than one kilometre away from valuable forest stands [9,13] to help divert game away from the stands in accordance with central-place foraging theory [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Browsing in forests threatens forest regeneration because it affects tree OPEN ACCESS growth and survival as well as lowers timber quality [5][6][7][8][9]. Although attempts have been made to reduce browsing damage by reducing browsing ungulate population densities through culling [10] it has not been very successful [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our framework, such landscape-based feedbacks include land uselandscape characteristic interactions, and influence mechanisms by which natural and social components interact, creating crossscale feedback dynamics. Land use affects landscape characteristics (e.g., Turner et al 2001, Hendrickx et al 2007, Grimm et al 2008, Millington et al 2010. For example, urbanization influences landscape pattern and process (McDonnell et al 1997, Luck andWu 2002), and leads to landscapes that are very different ecologically from what existed prior to urbanization.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%